Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehension of complex sentences in children at three levels of cognitive development

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between level of cognitive development and the comprehension of complex sentences in children. Twenty males and 20 females at the preoperational and concrete operational levels of cognitive development who were attending regular first-, fourth-, and seventh-grade classes served as subjects. Four examples each of parallel and nonparallel function forms of center-embedded and right-branching sentences served as stimuli within an object-manipulation task. The sentences were also described in terms of those containing a reversed word order clause, a clause with a role change (nonparallel function), neither, or both. Preoperational children could interpret sentences containing neither reversed word order nor role change as well as concrete operational children. Concrete operational children providing identity and reversibility arguments during conservation tasks had a significantly higher accuracy rate on sentences containing either role change or reversed word order than preoperational children. Concrete operational children providing reversibility, identity, and compensation arguments had a significantly higher accuracy rate on sentences containing role change and both role change and reversed word order than any other group of children. Preoperational children were noted to rely heavily on the use of word-order strategy to decode the sentences. Reliance on this strategy decreased as cognitive level advanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In J. Kavanagh & P. Strange (Ed.),Language and speech in the laboratory, school, and clinic. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., & Miller, J. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: Does production precede comprehension?Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to stage 6 object permanance development.Journal of Child Language, 5, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromer, R. F. (1980). Children are nice to understand: Surface structure clues for the recovery of a deep structure.British Journal of Psychology, 6, 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVilliers, J., Flusberg, H. B. T., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferriero, E., & Sinclair J. (1971). Temporal relationships in language.International Journal of Psychology, 6, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, M. & Leonard L. (1978). Language and sensorimotor development during the early period of referential speech.Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 21, 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1969).Piaget's theory of intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, B. D. & Greenfield, P. M. (1974) The search for structural principles in children's manipulative play: A parallel with linguistic development.Child Development, 46, 734–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M., Nelson, K., & Saltzman, E. (1972). The development of rule bound strategies for manipulating seriated cups: A parallel between action and grammar.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M., & Schneider, L. (1977). Building a tree structure: The development of hierarchecal complexity and interrupted strategies in children's construction activity.Developmental Psychology, 13, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakes, D. T. (1980).The development of metalinguistic abilities in children. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, M. The role of prosody and syntactic markers in children's comprehension of spoken sentences.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974,17, 656–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Chapman, R. S., Branston, M. B., & Reichle, J. (1980). Language comprehension in sensorimotor stages V and VI.Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 23, 284–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquistition of relative clauses in English.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. L. (1978). Verbal analogies and concrete operation.Australian Journal of Education, 19, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H. (1976, March 30).Comprehension of linguistic structures and their acquisition in different languages. Paper presented at Barnard College, New York.

  • Smith, J. W. A. (1976). Children's comprehension of metaphor: A Piagetian interpretation.Language and Speech, 19, 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohner, H., & Nelson, K. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form and strategies.Child Development, 45, 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, E. A., & Rommetviet, R. (1967). The acquisition of sentence, voice and reversibility.Child Development, 38, 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

abrahamsen, E.P., Rigrodsky, S. Comprehension of complex sentences in children at three levels of cognitive development. J Psycholinguist Res 13, 333–350 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068150

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068150

Keywords

Navigation