Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to assess the validity of previously reported sex differences in the frequency of interruptions during a dyadic conversation. In both experiments, 24 undergraduates (12 male, 12 female) were randomly paired with previously unacquainted partners out of the sample to create eight same-sex pairs and four cross-sex pairs. Each pair's discussion was secretly tape-recorded and later analyzed for two measures of interruption: rate of interruption and percentage of interruptions initiated by each speaker. Experiment 1 and 2 differed in the setting in which the conversations took place. The first experiment was conducted in a “casual setting,” and the latter in a “laboratory setting.” Contrary to previously reported findings, a tendency for females to interrupt males more than vice versa for both measures of interruption was revealed in Experiment 1. However, in Experiment 2, males were found to interrupt somewhat more than females. Finally, a highly significant interaction effect of setting was found, which suggests that there may be cause to believe there is a differential setting effect for males and females in the various groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design.Language in Society, 13, 145–204.
Bickerton, D. (1973). The nature of a creole continuum.Language, 49, 640–669.
Dindia, K. (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions.Human Communication Research, 13, 345–371.
Drass, K. A. (1986). The effect of gender identity on conversation.Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 294–301.
Eakins, B., & Eakins, J. (1978). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In B. L. Dubois & I. Crouch (Eds.),Papers in Southwestern English IV: Proceedings of the conference in the sociology of the languages of American women. (pp. 53–62). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.
Feldstein, S., & Welkowitz, J. (1987). A chronography of conversation: In defense of an objective approach. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication (2nd ed., pp 435–499). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295–302.
Fischer, J. (1958). Social influences in the choice of a linguistic variant.Word, 14, 47–56.
Fishman, P. M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do.Social Problems, 25, 397–406.
Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1985). Determinants of expert witness' opinions in insanity defense cases. In S. M. Talarico (Ed.),Courts and criminal justice: Emerging issues. Perspectives in criminal justice 9. (pp. 57–79). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences.Semiotica, 9, 47–96.
Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruptions.Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 45–48.
Kenny, P. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422–431.
Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties.American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.
Kraemer, H. C., & Jacklin, C. N. (1979). Statistical analysis of dyadic social behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 217–224.
Labov, W. (1966).The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, W. (1972).Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
LaFrance, M. (1981). Gender gestures: Sex, sex role, and nonverbal communication. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.),Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and women's place.Language in Society, 2, 45–80.
Levine, L., & Crochett, H. (1966). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Post vocalic r. In S. Lieberson (Ed.),Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Maltz, D., & Borker, R. (1982). Socialization and sex differences in speech interpretation. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.),Language and social identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301–316.
McCarrick, A. K., Manderscheid, R. W., & Silbergeld, S. (1981). Gender differences in competition and dominance during married-couples group therapy.Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 164–177.
Milroy, L. (1980).Language and social networks. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Murray, S. O. (1985). Toward a model of members' recognizing interruptions.Language in Society, 14, 31–40.
Natale, M., Entrin, E., & Jaffe, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865–878.
Ray, N., & Ravizza, R. (1985).Methods toward a science of behavior and experience (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Roger, D. B., & Schumacher, A. (1983). Effects of individual differences on dyadic conversational strategies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 700–705.
Rogers, W. T., & Jones, S. E. (1975). Effects of dominance tendencies on floor holding and interruption behavior in dyadic interaction.Communication Research.1, 113–122.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language, 50, 696–735.
Tannen, D. (1984).Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tannen, D. (1986).That's not what I meant!: How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York: Ballantine.
Trimboli, C., & Walker, M. B. (1984). Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 297–311.
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.Language in Society, 1, 179–195.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction.Social Problems, 24, 521–529.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kraemarae, & N. Henley (Eds.),Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne, C. Kraemarae, & N. Henley (Eds.),Language, gender and society (pp. 105–129). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The present experiments were conducted while the author attended the University of Toronto as an undergraduate student in the departments of psychology and anthropology. The author would like to extend special thanks to professors R. M. Bagby, I. Kalmar, and P. A. Reich for their advice in conducting both experiments, and to professor G. E. MacKinnon and for his valuable comments in revising the present paper. Finally, many special thanks go to professor K. Bloom, Ms. W. Chan, M. Lo, N. Mohan, and V. Okazawa for their enormous support and encouragement throughout the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nohara, M. Sex differences in interruption: An experimental reevaluation. J Psycholinguist Res 21, 127–146 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067991
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067991