Skip to main content
Log in

Children's understanding of linguistic reference to past and future

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young children's comprehension of linguistic reference to past and future times was investigated in two experiments. The children were 2, 3, and 4 years old. The linguistic forms considered were verb tense and the termsbefore andafter; each linguistic form was used in both experiments. The two experimental contexts were (1) actions which either had just occurred or were just about to occur, immediate past and future, and (2) events which either had occurred on the preceding day or were to occur on the following day, more remote past and future. Understanding of linguistic reference to past and future events varied, depending on the situation in which the particular form was applied. Future verb tense was better understood in reference to immediate than to more remote future. Past tense was understood equally well in reference to immediate past action and to more remote past events.Before andafter, both of which would be used to refer to either past or future time, were each better understood when used to refer to the next event or action following the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bever, T. (1970). The comprehension and memory of sentences with temporal relations. In Flores D'Arcais, G. B., and Levelt, W. J. M. (eds.),Advances in Psycholinguistics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (1970).Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckart, J. P., and Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect.Cognition 2:107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning ofbefore andafter.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10:266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.),Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromer, R. (1968). The development of temporal reference during the acquisition of language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Harner, L. (1971). Understanding of past and future verb tense by 2-year-old children. Unpublished paper.

  • Herriot, P. (1969). The comprehension of tense by young children.Child Develop. 40:103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., and Weiner, S. L. (1971). Comprehension in varying contexts.Cogn. Psychol. 2:369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (1970).Towards a Semantic Description of English, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, K., and Dixon, E. M. (1967). The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production.J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. Allied Disciplines 8:31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. (1971). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Dingwall, W.O. (ed.),A Survey of Linguistic Science, University of Maryland Linguistics Program, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C., and Stern, W. (1907).Die Kindersprache, Barth, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. On early development of expression of time. Unpublished manuscript, Clark University.

  • Werner, H., and Kaplan, B. (1963).Symbol Formation, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report is based on a dissertation submitted to Teachers College, Columbia University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harner, L. Children's understanding of linguistic reference to past and future. J Psycholinguist Res 5, 65–84 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067949

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067949

Keywords

Navigation