Abstract
The status of semantic conceptual structures in aphasia was investigated with relation to naming disorders in spontaneous and constrained speech production. A battery of six tasks was administered to 25 control subjects and 25 aphasics: spontaneous speech production (from which the percentage of nouns was calculated), confrontation naming, understanding class relationships (verbal and pictorial), and understanding thematic relationships (verbal and pictorial). Results indicated the important role of taxonomic abilities for naming, while other conceptual structures (i.e., thematic relations) do not seem to play any important role in the process of naming. These results are discussed in terms of the internal organization of semantic information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A. (1984). Speech production and comprehension: One lexicon or two? In W. Prinz and A. F. Sanders (Eds.)Cognition and motor processes.
Allport, D. A., & Funnell, E. (1981). Components of mental lexicon.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 295, 397–410.
Bisiacchi, P., Denes, G., & Semenza, C. (1976). Semantic field in aphasia: An experimental investigation on comprehension of the relation of class and property.Archives Suisses doe Neurologie, Neurochirurgie et Psychiatrie, 118, 207–213.
Butterworth, B., Howard, D, & McLoughlin, P. (1984). The semantic deficit in aphasia: The relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming.Neuropsychologia, 22(4), 409–426.
Caramazza, A., & Berndt, R. S. (1978). Semantic and syntactic processing in aphasia: A review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 898–918.
Caramazza, A., & Berndt, R. S. (1982). A psycholinguistic assessment of adult aphasia. In S. Rosenburg (Ed.),Handbook of applied Psycholinguistics (pp. 477–535). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. S., & Brownell, H. H. (1982). The semantic deficit hypothesis: Perceptual parsing and object classification by aphasic patients.Brain and Language, 15, 161–189.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language as fixed effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
Gainotti, G., Miceli, G., Caltagirone, C., Silveri, M. C., & Masullo, C. (1981). The relationship between type of naming error and semantic-lexical discrimination in aphasic patients.Cortex, XVII, 401–410.
Goodglass, H., & Baker, E. (1976). Semantic field, naming and auditory comprehension in aphasia.Brain and Language, 3, 359–374.
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972).The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
Kay, J., & Ellis, A. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological care of anomia: Implications for psychological models of word retrieval.Brain, 110, 1–17.
Kohn, S. E., & Goodglass, H. (1985). Picture naming in aphasia.Brain and Language, 24, 266–283.
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C. J. M. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.).New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Saffran, E. M. (1982). Neuropsychological approaches to the study of language.British Journal of Psychology, 73, 317–337.
Semenza, C. (1985). Comprehension of artificial concepts in brain damaged patients.Archives Suisses de Neurologie, Neurochirurgie et Psychiatrie, 3, 25–31.
Semenza, C., Denes, G., Lucchese, D., & Bisiacchi, P. (1980). Selective deficit of conceptual structures in aphasia: Class versus thematic relations.Brain and Language, 10, 243–248.
Shallice, T. (1988a).From neuropsychology to mental stricture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Shallice, T. (1988b). Specialization within the semantic system.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(1), 133–142.
Shallice, T., & Coughlan, A. K. (1980). Modality specific word comprehension deficits in deep dyslexia.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 43, 866–872.
Smiley, S. S., & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249–257.
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments.Brain, 107, 829–854.
Wayland, S., & Taplin, J. E. (1982). Nonverbal categorization in fluent and nonfluent anomic aphasics.Brain and Language, 16, 87–108.
Whitehouse, P., Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. (1978). Naming in aphasia: Interacting effects of form and function.Brain and Language, 6, 63–74.
Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A., Myerson, R., & Galvin, J. (1974). Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language.Brain and Language, 1, 167–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by grants to Drs. Semenza and Bisiacchi from the Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione and by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Unita 14, Scienza del Comportamento.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semenza, C., Bisiacchi, P.S. & Romani, L. Naming disorders and semantic representations. J Psycholinguist Res 21, 349–364 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067920
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067920