Skip to main content
Log in

In and behind a Lenneberg paradigm

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lenneberg suggested that a chimpanzee's linguistic ability could be tested by presenting sentences containing two prepositional phrases joined by a conjunction. This would involve joining two semantic propositions, and thus represents a more complex test of chimpanzee syntactic competence than previously attempted. Jane, a five year-old language trained chimpanzee, was tested on her ability to both produce and comprehend sentences involving a preposition (“in” or “behind”) and a conjunction (“and”). The results from production and comprehension were substantially the same. Jane showed the ability to appropriately deploy “and,” “behind” and “in,” but displayed very little flexibility in their use. It is suggested that a chimpanzee may be able to learn some rules of syntax but is not able to be creative with that syntax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gardner, B. T., & Gardner, R. A. Evidence for sentence constituents in the early utterances of child and chimpanzee.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 224–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. F. The origin of speech.Scientific American, 1960,203, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E. H. Of language, knowledge, apes and brains.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1971,1, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounin, G. Language, communication, chimpanzees.Current Anthropology, 1976,17, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncer, S. J.Communication and syntax in the chimpanzee. Doctoral dissertations, London University, 1983.

  • Muncer, S. J., & Ettlinger, G. Communication by a chimpanzee: First-trial mastery of word order that is critical for meaning, but failure to negate a conjunction.Neuropsychologia, 1981,19, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncer, S. J., Malone, D., & Ettlinger, G. Language in a monkey?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982,54, 1179–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D.Intelligence in apes and man. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace, H. S., Petitto, L. A., Sanders, R. J., & Bever, T. G. Can an ape create a sentence?Science, 1979,206, 891–902.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muncer, S.J., Ettlinger, G. In and behind a Lenneberg paradigm. J Psycholinguist Res 13, 57–68 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067902

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067902

Keywords

Navigation