Abstract
Several experiments designed to test the psychological validity of Chomsky and Halle's (1968) Vowel Shift Rule are reviewed, and both positive and negative evidence is evaluated. Moskowitz's (1973) claim that speakers' knowledge of vowel alternations is due to their knowledge of spelling rules is introduced, and an experiment designed to differentiate between behavior based on the Vowel Shift Rule and on spelling rules is presented in detail. It is shown that subjects in this experiment, and in previous experiments that claimed to have obtained positive evidence for the Vowel Shift Rule, are behaving in accord with spelling rules and not the Vowel Shift Rule. It is argued that literacy is a possible source of psychologically real linguistic knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cena, R. When is a phonological generalization psychologically real? Bloomington. Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M.The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
Derwing, B. L.Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. The psychological basis for morphological rules. In J. Macnamara (Ed.),Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 85–110.
Jaeger, J. J.Categorization in phonology: An experimental approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1980.
Kiparsky, P. What are phonological theories about? In D. Cohen & J. Wirth (Eds.),Testing linguistic hypothesis. New York: Wiley, 1975. Pp. 187–209.
Kiparsky, P. & Menn, L. On the acquisition of phonology. In J. Manamara (Ed.),Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 47–78.
McCawley, J. D. Remarks on Cena's vowel shift experiment. In P. R. Clyne, W. F. Hanks, & C. L. Hofbauer (Eds.),The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1979.
Moskowitz, B. A. On the status of vowel shift in English. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Congnitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 223–260.
Myerson, R. F.A study of children's knowledge of certain word formation rules and the relationship of this knowledge to various forms of reading achievement. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1976. (a)
Myerson, R. F. Children's knowledge of selected aspects ofSound Pattern of English. In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (eds.),Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches. New York: Plenum Press, 1976. (b) Pp. 377–402.
Ohala, J. J. Experimental historical phonology. In J. M. Anderson & C. Jones (Eds.),Historical linguistics II: Theory and description in phonology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1974. Pp. 353–389.
Read, C. Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology.Harvard Educational Review, 1971,41, 1–34.
Rosch, E. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1978. Pp. 27–48.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 382–439.
Steinberg, D. D., & Krohn, R. K. The psychological validity of Chomsky and Halle's vowel shift rule. In E. Koerner (Ed.),The transformational paradigm and modern linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1975, Pp. 233–259.
Wolfe, P. M.Linguistic change and the Great Vowel Shift in English. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaeger, J.J. Assessing the psychological status of the Vowel Shift Rule. J Psycholinguist Res 13, 13–36 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067900
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067900