Skip to main content
Log in

Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two questionnaire studies and a reading time experiment investigated the application of the late-closure principle in Italian, a Romance language which contrasts with English with respect to several linguistic properties. All the studies addressed interpretation preferences in sentences containing a complex NP followed by a relative clause (e.g....the son of the woman who arrived yesterday...). While the questionnaires investigated final preferences, the reading time experiment addressed also the principle governing the initial attachment of a relative clause to a complex NP. Furthermore, through a manipulation of the type of preposition within the complex NP, we investigated the role of the thematic structure of the complex NP in initial and final parsing. The results showed that the late-closure principle applies in Italian to the initial parsing without being affected by the thematic structure of the complex NP. Final interpretation instead shows an effect of pragmatic preference and an effect of thematic structure on syntactic revisions. The results are discussed in terms of a parsing model that adopts syntactic parsing strategies and makes modular use of linguistic information. Some implications for the relationship between syntactic theories and the human parser are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney S. (1988).A computational model of human parsing. Paper presented at the First Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.

  • Chomsky, N. (1986).Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C. (1988, August).Restrictions on late closure: Appearance and reality. Paper presented at the 6th Australian Language and Speech Conference, University of New South Wales.

  • Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish.Cognition, 30, 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vincenzi, M. (1991).Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vincenzi, M., Job, R. (1989, September).Some observations on the universality of the late closure strategy: Evidence from Italian. Paper presented at the Workshop on Language Comprehension, Aix-en Provence, France.

  • Fodor, J. D. (1979). Superstrategy. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker, (Eds.),Sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1978).On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frzzier, L. (1990). Parsing modifiers: special purpose routines in the HSPM? In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.Cognition, 6, 291–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension.Cognition, 13, 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning.Foundations of Language, 4, 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of structure parsing in natural languages.Cognition, 2, 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. C., & Cuetos, F. (1991)Restrictions on late closure: The computational underpinnings of parsing strategies in Spanish and English. Unpublished paper.

  • Pritchett, B. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of linguistic performance.Language 64, 539–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowiaczek, M. L. (1981).Prosodic units as language processing units. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Stowe, L. (1989). Thematic structure and sentence comprehension. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M., & Carlson, G. (1988). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vincenzi, M., Job, R. Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy. J Psycholinguist Res 22, 189–206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067830

Keywords

Navigation