Abstract
This paper describes an ongoing research program designed to investigate how syntactic and semantic aspects of lexical information become available to the sentence processing system. The two experiments described here distinguished between syntactic and semantic representations by using cross-modal naming and lexical decision in a new way. The relationship between the main verb and the probe word was varied such that the probe word met either the syntactic criteria to be an argument, the semantic criteria, neither, or both the syntactic and semantic criteria. Lexical decision times were sensitive to both syntactic and semantic congruity, while naming times were sensitive only to syntactic congruity. The two tasks were then used to investigate syntactic and semantic representations when verb argument structure was ambiguous. Subcategorized structures were constructed without regard for biasing context, but the contextually inappropriate thematic frame was ruled out while the inappropriate syntactic frame was still available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word-frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.
Bock, J. K., & Kroch, A. S. (1989). The isolability of syntactic processing. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Boland, J. E. (1991).The use of lexical information in sentence processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Boland, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1991). The role of lexical representations in sentence processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cooper, W. E., Paccia, J. M., & LaPointe, S. G. (1978). Hierarchical coding in speech timing.Cognitive Psychology, 10, 154–177.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). How is verb information used during syntactic parsing? In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1985). Effects of constraint and validity of sentence contexts on lexical decisions.Memory & Cognition, 13, 128–139.
Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495.
Frazier, L. (1989). Against lexical generation of syntax. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and memory (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
Goodman, G. O., McClelland, J. L., and Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 9, 580–586.
Gorrell, P. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 61–74.
Gorrell, P. (1991). Informational encapsulation and syntactic processing.NELS Proceedings, 21, 127–143.
Grosjean, F., Grosjean, L., & Lane, H. (1979). The patterns of silence: Performance structures in sentence production.Cognitive Psychology, 11, 58–81.
Kleiman, G. M. (1980). Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: Sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects.Memory & Cognition, 8, 336–344.
Mitchell, D. C. (1989). Verb-guidance and other lexical effects in parsing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 123–154.
O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1990). A perspective on sentence context research. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Peterson, R. R., Burgess, R. C., Dell, G. S., & Eberhard, K., (1989).Dissociation of syntactic and semantic analyses during idiom processing. Paper presented at the second annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, March, New York, NY.
Schuberth, R. E., & Eimas, P. D. (1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 27–36.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words.Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232–252.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and post-lexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 12, 315–328.
Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E. B., & Grimshaw, J. (1989). Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability.Journal of Psycholingusitic Research, 18, 223–243.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.
Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1). London: Erlbaum.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–660.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Boland, J. E., & Garnsey, S. M. (1992). Argument structure in parsing and interpretation. Unpublished manuscript.
Tanenhaus, M. K., & Juliano, C. (1993). Unpublished paper.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427–440.
Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (in press). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 683–692.
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.Memory & Cognition, 14, 104–112.
Wright, B., & Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences.Memory & Cognition, 12, 31–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The experiments reported here constitute Experiments 2 and 3 of the author's dissertation, completed at the University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, and are reported in more detail in that manuscript (Boland, 1991). Many thanks to Michael Tanenhaus for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boland, J.E. The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing: Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects. J Psycholinguist Res 22, 133–152 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067828
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067828