Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of gender and topic on speech style

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male and female subjects described nine photographs that had been selected to be of interest to males, females, or both. The resulting speech samples were analyzed for the incidence of five features of word production and five features associated with a “women's language” (WL) speech style. Results showed that topic (photograph type) determined aspects of speech production. However, there were no gender differences in production or style. Correlations between dependent variables suggested that WL is a consistent set of features. Its use by both female and male speakers may reflect social uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyle, M., Lalljee, M., & Cook, M. (1968). The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad.Human Relations, 21, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female, and mixed groups.Small Group Behavior, 7, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypothesis.Language in Society, 6, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Hobby, A. K., & Craik, K. (1969). Nonlinguistic factors in oral language productivity.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 29, 871–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 616–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. J., & Powers, W. G. (1978). Verbal behavior as a function of apprehension and social context.Human Communication Research, 4, 294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and women's place.Language in Society, 2, 45–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, J., Mechling, E. W., & Stathas, S. (1981). Differences in subjects' perceptions of gender and believability between users of deferential and non-deferential language.Communication Quarterly, 29, 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. R., Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Gale, W. S. (1977). women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?Sex Roles, 3, 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M., & Atkins, B. K. (1980). “Women's language” or “powerless language”? In S. McConnell-Ginet, N. Borker, & R. Thurman (Eds.),Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. C. (1977). The rhetorical interrogative: Anxiety or control?Human Communication Research, 4, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. L., & Nelson, M. W. (1983). Multiple determinants of a stigmatized speech style: Women's language, powerless language, or everyone's language?Language and Speech, 26, 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, F. (1984, June 28).Interaction involvement, gender role, and selected conversational behaviors. Paper presented at the National Women's Studies Association, Douglass College, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

  • Smith, P. M. (1979). Sex markers in speech. In K. P. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.),Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (1980).Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swacker, M. (1975) The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.),Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (1966). The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech.Word, 22, 112–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank Janis Glenn and Cynthia Johnson for help in collecting and transcribing data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, M., Chaffin, R. Effects of gender and topic on speech style. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 83–89 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067752

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067752

Keywords

Navigation