Skip to main content
Log in

Processing idioms with multiple meanings

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments are presented that examine understanding of idioms with one or more meaning. The results of Experiment 1 showed that subjects took longer to read and make paraphrase judgments for idioms when both their idiomatic and literal meanings are intended than it did to comprehend idioms meant only literally or idiomatically. In Experiments 2 and 3, subjects were faster at making phrase classification judgments for idioms with several different nonliteral interpretations than they were to make the same judgments for idioms with only one idiomatic interpretation. These findings suggest that idioms with more entries in the mental lexicon are accessed faster because it is more likely that one of their meanings will be encountered in a short time. The data overall support the idea that idioms are represented differently depending on their number of associated meanings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boatner, M. T., Gates, J. E., & Makkai, A. (1975).A dictionary of American idioms. New York: Barons Educational Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation.Memory and Cognition, 8, 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. (1985). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation.Discourse Processes, 9, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R., Gonzales, G. P. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms.Cognition, 20, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R., & Cooper, L. (1978). Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasks.Cognitive Psychology, 10, 391–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meaning, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology, 13, 273–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrzembski, J. E., & Stanners, R. F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 534–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.18, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a Faculty Research Grant from the University of California, Santa Cruz. We wish to thank Dennis Johnston for his assistance in running subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, R.A.G., Gibbs, R.W. Processing idioms with multiple meanings. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 63–81 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067751

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067751

Keywords

Navigation