Skip to main content
Log in

The interaction of strategy and context in children's oral reading performance

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was designed to test the interactive reading theory prediction that children's reading strategies vary with the availability of higher-level information. Third- and fourthgrade children (aged 8 and 9 years, respectively) were assigned to one of three context conditions and one of three experimental instructions conditions. Results supported the hypothesis the children adopt different oral reading speed strategies, depending on the amount of contextual information available, in order to maximize reading accuracy and, where appropriate, ongoing comprehension. When reading meaningful materials, children adopt a fluent, top-down reading strategy that is relatively resistant to modification. Although a slower, bottom-up strategy is preferred in the reading of words in isolation, children are able to modify this strategy in accordance with experimental instructions. These results are consistent with an interactive theory of reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allington, R. L. (1978). Effects of contextual constraints upon rate and accuracy.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. L. (1979). Word identification abilities of severely disabled readers: A comparison in isolation and context.Journal of Reading Behavior, 10, 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. L., & Fleming, J. T. (1978). The misreading of high frequency words.Journal of Special Education, 12, 417–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, M. J. (1980). The effect of different types of substitution miscues on reading.Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 324–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read.Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (1982a). Intrasentence contextual facilitation in children's oral reading.Reading Psychology, 3.

  • Bowey, J. A. (1982b). Memory limitations in the oral reading comprehension of fourth-grade children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 200–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1972). Defining language comprehension: Some speculations. In R. O. Freedle & J. B. Carroll (Eds.),Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, D.C.: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chihara, T., Oller, J., Weaver, K., & Chavez-Oller, M. A. (1977). Are cloze items sensitive to constraints across sentences?Language Learning, 27, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, R. G. (1974). The effect of context on word recognition.Slow Learning Child, 21, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danks, J. H., & Hill, G. O. (1981). An interactive analysis of oral reading. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D. G. (1976). Acquisition of rapid reading responses.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,41, (No. 2).

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1980). Do beginners learn to read function words better in sentences or in lists?Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T. (1970). Influence of sentence order and amount of higher level text processing upon reproductive and productive memory.American Educational Research Journal, 7, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T., & Washington, E. D. (1970). Children's ability to comprehend text.Proceedings of the 78th Convention of the American Psychological Association.

  • Golinkoff, R. M., & Rosinski, R. R. (1976). Decoding, semantic processing, and reading comprehension skill.Child Development, 47, 252–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1965). A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading.Elementary English, 42, 639–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game.Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1973). Miscues: Windows on the reading process. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),Miscue analysis: Applications to reading instruction. Urbana, Illinois: ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. (1975). The structure of language. In D. D. Duance & M. B. Rawson (Eds.),Reading, perception and language. Baltimore: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. N. (1978). Visual perception.Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakson, R. L., & Miller, J. W. (1976). Sensitivity to syntactic and semantic cues in good and poor comprehenders.Journal of Education Psychology, 68, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1980). Comparisons of word identification strategies with varying context, word type, and reader skill.Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., & Kohout, I. J. (1975a). Special topics in linear models. In N. H. Nie, C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner, & D. H. Bent (Eds.),Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. O., & Kohout, I. J. (1975b). Analysis of variance and covariance: Subprograms ANOVA and ONEWAY. In N. H. Nie, C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner, & D. H. Bent (Eds.),Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krulee, G. K., Fairweather, P. G. & Bergquist, S. R. (1979). Organizing factors in the comprehension and recall of connected discourse.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, E. (1970). The effect of context on the reading of mentally retarded and normal children at first grade level.Journal of Special Education, 4, 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.Child Development, 50, 643–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. D. (1966).Neale analysis of reading ability, (2nd. ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, N. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, S. S. (1974). Development of phrase and clause boundary reading in children.Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonell, F. J. (1955).Reading tests. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwantes, F. M. (1981). Locus of the context effect in children's word recognition.Child Development, 52, 895–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwantes, F. M., Boesl, S. L., & Ritz, E. G. (1980). Children's use of context in word recognition: A psycholinguistic guessing game.Child Development, 51, 730–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siler, E. R. (1974). The effects of syntactic and semantic constraints on the oral reading performance of second and fourth graders.Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 603–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. (1971).Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1981). Attentional and automatic context effects in reading. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.)Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Feeman, D. J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive-compensatory model.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T. G. (1972). Learning by listening. In R. O. Freedle & J. B. Carroll (Eds.),Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, D. C.: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first grade reading errors.Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 427–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages.Child Development, 49, 717–727.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Roger Wales and Jenni Langford for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowey, J.A. The interaction of strategy and context in children's oral reading performance. J Psycholinguist Res 13, 99–117 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067695

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067695

Keywords

Navigation