Skip to main content
Log in

The comprehension of idioms

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four experiments will performed to examine how familiar idioms are interpreted. Subjects had to respond as rapidly as possible whether an idiom had the same or different meaning as a phrase which, on half of the trials, was a paraphrase of either the figurative or literal meaning of the idiom. When subjects were instructed to respond on the basis of either figurative or literal meaning, idioms were matched to their literal and figurative paraphrases equally rapidly. When subjects were instructed to respond only on the basis of literal meaning, idiom-phrase pairs that shared a figurative interpretation took longer to reject as different than idiom pairs that shared no interpretation. These results domonstrated that whenever a familiar idiom is comprehended, both its literal and figurative interpretations are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock, J. K., & Brewer, W. F. Comprehension and memory of the literal and figurative meaning of proverbs.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1980,9, 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. K., & Glass, A. L. Reading and listening to high and low imagery sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B.The verb-particle combination in English. Tokyo: Taishukan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heringer, J. Idioms and lexicalization in English. In J. P. Kimball (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: The grammar of causative constructions (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. The stimulus familiarity problem in semantic memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, F. The insertion of idioms. InPapers from the Eighth Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. The access and processing of idiomatic expressions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, U. Problems in the analysis of idioms. In J. Puhvel (Ed.),Proceedings of the Summer 1966 Linguistics Forum at UCLA. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Grant RO3 MH29398 to Arnold L. Glass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glass, A.L. The comprehension of idioms. J Psycholinguist Res 12, 429–442 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067624

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067624

Keywords

Navigation