Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic judgments of compressed monosyllables: Evidence for phonetic symbolism

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both frequency and speed of utterance have been implicated in studies of phonetic symbolism. Therefore, these two variables were manipulated independently. Three monosyllables were recorded and distorted by either increasing or decreasing frequency, holding speed constant, and by increasing or decreasing speed, holding frequency constant. The subjects were 15 college students who rated the resulting 15 stimuli (3 monosyllables X fast speed-normal frequency, slow speed-normal frequency, normal speed-high frequency, normal speed-low frequency, and normal speed-normal frequency) using 15 bipolar adjective scales, chosen on the basis of previous semantic differential and phonetic symbolism research. Five separate factor analyses were applied to the data. It was found that the normal speed-low frequency, slow speed-normal frequency, and normal speed-normal frequency stimuli generated approximately the same factors, while the fast speed-normal frequency and normal speed-high frequency stimuli generated factors similar to each other but with some notable differences. Separate analyses of variance were applied to the bipolar adjectives using speed, frequency, and vowels as main effects. The 15 analyses showed that subjects did judge the monosyllables as different on the basis of both speed and frequency. The implications of this study for phonetic symbolism research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, R.Words and things, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. W., Black, A. H. & Horowitz, A. E. Phonetic symbolism in natural languages.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955,50, 388–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniloff, R. G., Shriner, T. H., & Zemlin, W. R. Intelligibility of vowels altered in duration and frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1968,44, 700–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denes, P. B. & Pinson, E. N.The speech chain: The physics and biology of spoken language. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, M. A study of phonetic symbolism in deaf children.Psychological Monographs, 1940,52, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Jorgensen, E. On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels.Studia Linguistica, 1978,32, 80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulke, E., & Sticht, T. G. Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O.Language: Its nature, development, and origin London: Allen and Unwin, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzrock, G. H. The effects of time and frequency distortion upon word intelligibility.Speech Monographs, 1957,24, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P.A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J.The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M. S. A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961,62, 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. Further experiments in phonetic symbolism.American Journal of Psychology, 1933,45, 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Boyle, M. W., & Tarte, R. D. Implications for phonetic symbolism: The relationship between pure tones and geometric figures.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1980,9, 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. A study in phonetic symbolism.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1929,12, 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D. Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of Czech.Language and Speech, 1974,17, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D.Phonetic symbolism for pure tones. Paper presented at the November meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, 1976.

  • Tarte, R. D.The relationship between monosyllables and pure tones: An investigation of phonetic symbolism.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1982,21, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., & Barritt, L. S. Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: Three studies.Language and Speech, 1971,14, 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. K. Phonetic symbolism re-examined.Psychological Bulletin, 1963,60, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I.Introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. K., & Taylor, M. M. Another look at phonetic symbolism,Psychological Bulletin, 1965,64, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. P., & Koury, G. Transfer effects from listening to frequency-controlled and frequency-shifted accelerated speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1981,24, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarte, R.D., O'Boyle, M.W. Semantic judgments of compressed monosyllables: Evidence for phonetic symbolism. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 183–196 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067562

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067562

Keywords

Navigation