Skip to main content
Log in

Will the real grandmother please stand up? The psychological reality of dual meaning representations

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two types of meaning representation are described, symptom and criterion, and it is argued that both have psychological status in mental representations of kinship terms. Certain symptoms, such as old age and biofocals for grandmothers, are likely indicators of grandmotherhood, but they do not reliably pick out all positive instances, nor do they indicate negative ones. Criteria specify the necessary and sufficient conditions for grandmotherhood: having a grandchild. The psychological reality of these two representations was demonstrated by asking children and adults to select kin-term exemplars from pictures in which both age and reciprocal kin symptoms are displayed, and to justify their selections. In both tasks, there was change with age away from using typical age as the sole basis for performance; older subjects selected pictures displaying reciprocal kin, and justified their choices by referring to the criterion. More important, at each age level, there was evidence for dual representation: Even subjects who selected pictures based on the age symptom often gave criterial justifications, and subjects who selected pictures based on the reciprocal kin symptom still preferred pictures displaying age symptoms in addition to the reciprocal kin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. What some concepts might not be. Forthcoming.

  • Carey, S. Semantic development. In L. R. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.),Language acquisition: State of the art. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press in press.

  • Clark, E. V. What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. Identity and necessity. In S. P. Schwartz (Ed.),Naming, necessity, and natural kinds. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.Judgment and reasoning in the child. Totowa, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams, 1972. (Originally published, 1928.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. Meaning and reference. In S. P. Schwartz (Ed.),Naming, necessity, and natural kinds. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. H. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., Rips, L. J., & Shoben, E. J. Semantic memory and psychological semantics. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.The blue and brown books (1933–1935). New York: Harper & Row, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landau, B. Will the real grandmother please stand up? The psychological reality of dual meaning representations. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 47–62 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067501

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067501

Keywords

Navigation