Abstract
GB phrase markers are populated with empty categories that are hard to detect using current psycholinguistic techniques. What implications does this have for a grammatical theory that postulates them? How might these psycholinguistic facts be accommodated? Some modest proposals are offered for further consideration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension.Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.
Chomsky, N. (1975).Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155–209.
Hornstein, N. (1989). Verb raising in Icelandic infinitives.Proceedings of Nels, 20.
MacDonald, M. C. (1989). Priming effects from gaps to antecedents.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 1–72.
McElree, B., & Bever, T. G. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 21–35.
Nicol, J. (1988).Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure of coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hornstein, N. A primer on PRO (and other empty categories). J Psycholinguist Res 20, 187–196 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067214
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067214