Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

The relativity of linguistic intuition: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments

  • Hiroshi Nagata
Article

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to show the relativity of linguistic intuition in grammaticality judgments. In Experiment 1, 12 students judged the relative grammaticality of isolated sentences twice, receiving a repetition treatment between the two judgments. During the repetition phase, they were exposed to a repeated presentation of sentences. The findings show that the repetition treatment makes a judgment criterion more stringent for both grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. In Experiment 2, a release-from-the-proactive-inhibition paradigm was used. Twelve students first judged the grammaticality of the isolated sentences, then received the repetition treatment, and finally, made a second judgment for the sentences embedded in context. No change in judgment criterion was found for the second judgment. Judgments of the ungrammatical sentences, when embedded in context, were found to be more lenient. In Experiment 3, 12 students judged sentences embedded in context. No change in judgment criterion was found. These findings are interpreted as suggesting that linguistic intuitions as revealed in grammaticality judgments are not absolute but relative in that they are easily influenced by repetition and other variables, such as embedded context.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bever, T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bolinger, D. (1968). Judgments of grammaticality.Lingua,21, 34–40.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, J.M. (1979). Complex compounds: Phrasal embedding in lexical structures.Linguistics,17, 863–877.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, J.M., Bever, T.G., & Pollack, C.R. (1981). The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions.Language,57, 368–383.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1964).Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N. (1967).Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1968).Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1975).The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 335–359.Google Scholar
  12. Deese, J. (1970).Psycholinguistics. Boston: Allyan and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R.A. (1972).A theory of objective self awareness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greenbaum, S. (1976). Contextual influence on acceptability judgements.Linguistics,187, 5–11.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, A. A. (1961). Grammaticality.Word,17, 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Kirk, R.G. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  17. Kuno, S. (1973).Nihon Bunpo Kenkyu. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
  18. Kuno, S. (1983).Shin Nihon Bunpo Kenkyu. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, T.E. (1975). Linguistic intuitions of twelve year-olds.Language and Speech,18, 213–216.Google Scholar
  20. Slobin, D.I. (1971).Psycholinguistics. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  21. Slobin, D.I. (1979).Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  22. Spencer, N.J. (1973). Difference between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2, 83–98.Google Scholar
  23. Steinberg, D.D. (1982).Psycholinguistics: Language, mind, and world. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Wickens, D.D. (1970). Encoding categories of word: An empirical approach to meaning.Psychological Review,77, 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Wickens, D.D., Born, D.G., & Allen, C.K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,2, 440–445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Nagata
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Health SciencesOkayama UniversityShikata, OkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations