Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 175–199 | Cite as

Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach

  • John C. Marshall
  • Freda Newcombe
Article

Abstract

A sample of the literature on acquired dyslexia is reviewed with special reference to the nature of paralexic errors. Linguistic studies of six cases of dyslexia are presented, with appropriate neurological and psychological details; there are two cases of each of three hypothesized types of impairment, visual dyslyxia, “surface” (grapheme-phoneme) dyslexia, and “deep” (syntactico-semantic) dyslexia. Finally, a scheme for acquired dyslexia is proposed and related to the error patterns observed in “normal” adult readers and in children learning to read; our approach to lexical look-up is one that the diagram makers may have found sympathique.

References

  1. Alajouanine, Th., Lhermitte, F., and Ribaucourt-Ducarne, Bl. de (1960) Les alexies agnosiques et aphasiques. In Alajouanine, Th. (ed.),Les Grandes Activités du Lobe Occipital. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Anisfield, M., and Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.J. Exp. Psychol. 77, 171–179.Google Scholar
  3. Asayama, T. (1914). Über die Aphasie bei Japanern.Deut. Arch. Klin. Med. 113, 523–529.Google Scholar
  4. Bastian, H. C. (1898).A Treatise on Aphasia and Other Speech Defects. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
  5. Benson, D. F., and Geschwind, N. (1969). The alexias. In Vinken, P. J. and Bruyn, G. W. (eds.),Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 4 North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Benton, A. L. (1964). Contributions to aphasia before Broca.Cortex 1, 314–327.Google Scholar
  7. Berdiansky, B., Cronnell, B., and Koehler, J. (1969). Spelling-Sound Relations and Primary Form-Class Descriptions for Speech-Comprehension Vocabularies of 6–9 year-olds.Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, Technical Report, No. 15.Google Scholar
  8. Beringer, K., and Stein, J. (1930). Analyse eines Falles von “Reiner” Alexie.Z. Ges. Neurol. u. Psych. 123, 472–478.Google Scholar
  9. Bever, T., and Bower, T. G. R. (1966): How to read without listening.Project Literacy Report No. 6, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  10. Bierwisch, M. (1970). Fehler-Linguistik.Linguistic Inquiry 1, 397–414.Google Scholar
  11. Bower, T. G. R. (1970). Reading by eye. In Levin, H. and Williams, J. P. (eds.),Basic Studies on Reading, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Broadbent, D. E. (1967). The word frequency effect and response bias.Psych. Rev. 74, 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Broadbent, D. E., and Gregory, M. H. P. (1971). Effects on tachistoscopic perception from independent variation of word probability and of letter probability.Acta Psych. 35, 1–14.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S., and O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words.Lang. Speech 1, 98, 101.Google Scholar
  15. Casey, T., and Ettlinger, G. (1960). The occasional ‘independence’ of dyslexia and dysgraphia from dysphasia.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 23, 228–236.Google Scholar
  16. Cattlell, J. McKeen (1886). The inertia of the eye and brain.Brain 8, 295–312.Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky, N. (1979). Phonology and reading. In Levin, H. and Williams, J. P. (eds.),Basic Studies in Reading. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Clay, M. M. (1969). Reading errors and self-correction behavior.Brit. J. Educ. Psych. 39, 47–56.Google Scholar
  19. Crosland, H. R., and Johnson, G. (1928). The range of apprehension as affected by inter-letter hair-spacing and by the character of individual letters.J. Appl. Psych. 12, 82–124.Google Scholar
  20. Dale, H. C. A., and Gregory, M. (1966). Evidence of semantic coding in short-term memory.Psychon. Sci. 5, 75–76.Google Scholar
  21. Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution a l'étude anatomopathologique et clinique des differents varietes de cecité verbale.Comp. Rend. Scéan. Biol. 4, 61–90.Google Scholar
  22. Dubois-Charlier, F. (1971). Approche neurolinguistique du problème de l'aexie pure.J. Psych. 68, 39–67.Google Scholar
  23. Dunn-Rankin, P., and Leton, D. A. (1968). Hierarchical grouping procedures for comparing indices of letter similarity.Perceptual and Motor Skills 27, 457–458.Google Scholar
  24. Elder, W. (1897).Aphasia and the Cerebral Speech Mechanism. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
  25. Elder, W. (1900). The clinical varieties of visual aphasia.Edinburgh Med. J. 49, 433–454.Google Scholar
  26. Erdmann, B., and Dodge, R. (1898).Psychologische Untersuchungen uber das Lesen auf Experimenteller Grundlage. Neimeyer, Halle.Google Scholar
  27. Franz, S. I. (1930). The relations of aphasia.J. Gen. Psych. 3, 401–411.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. (1891).Zur Auffassung der Aphasien. Deuticke, Leipzig and Vienna.Google Scholar
  29. Geschwind, N. (1962). The anatomy of acquired disorders of reading. In Money, J. (ed.),Reading Disorders. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  30. Gibson, E. J., and Guinet, L. (1971). Perception of inflections in brief visual presentations of words.J. Verb. Learn. Behav. 10, 182–189.Google Scholar
  31. Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., and Hammond, J. (1962). The role of graphemephoneme correspondence in the perception of words.Amer. J. Psych. 75, 554–570.Google Scholar
  32. Gibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A., and Yonas, A. (1970). Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In Levin, H. and Williams, J. P. (eds.),Basic Studies in Reading, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Gill, V. (1970). Factors affecting the comprehension of written English texts. Term Paper, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  34. Gloning, I., Gloning, K., and Hoff, H. (1968).Neuropsychological Symptoms and Syndromes in Lesions of the occipital Lobe and the Adjacent Areas. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
  35. Goldscheider, A., and Muller, R. F. (1893). Zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Lesens.Z. f. Klin. Med. 23, 131–167.Google Scholar
  36. Goldstein, K. (1948).Language and Language Disturbances. Grune and Strastton, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Goodglass, H., and Hunter, M. (1970). A linguistic comparison of speech and writing in two types of aphasia.J. Commun. Dis. 3, 28–35.Google Scholar
  38. Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of oral reading miscues: applied psycholinguistics.Reading Res. Quart. 5, 9–30.Google Scholar
  39. Halpern, H. (1965). Effects of stimulus variables on dysphasic verbal errors.Perceptual and Motor Skills,21, 292–298.Google Scholar
  40. Havens, L. L., and Foote, W. E. (1963). The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency.J. Exp. Psych. 65, 6–11.Google Scholar
  41. Hécaen, H. (1967). Aspects des troubles de la lecture (alexies) au cours des lésions cérébrales on foyer.Word 23, 265–287.Google Scholar
  42. Heimann, A., and Thorner, H. (1929). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Psychologie des Lesens.Arch. Ges. Psych. 71, 165–184.Google Scholar
  43. Henley, N. M., Noyes, H. L., and Deese, J. (1968). Semantic structure in short-term memory.J. Exper. Psych. 77, 587–592.Google Scholar
  44. Hinshelwood, J. (1900).Letter-, Word- and Mind-Blindness. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
  45. Holmes, G. (1950). Pure word blindness.Folia Psychiat. Neurol. Neerl. 53, 279–288.Google Scholar
  46. Holmes, J. M., Marshall, J. C., and Newcombe, F. (1971). Syntactic class as a determinant of word-retrieval in normal and dyslexic subjects.Nature (in press).Google Scholar
  47. Holmes, J. M., Newcombe, F., and Marshall, J. C. (1971). “Literal” errors in acquired dyslexia. (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  48. Horowitz, L. M., Chilian, P. C., and Dunnigan, K. P. (1969). Word fragments and their redintegrative powers.J. Exp. Psych. 80, 392–394.Google Scholar
  49. Hughlings-Jackson, J. (1878). On affections of speech from disease of the brain.Brain 1, 304–330.Google Scholar
  50. Ilg, F. L., and Ames, L. B. (1950). Developmental trends in reading.J. Genet. Psych. 76, 291–312.Google Scholar
  51. Javal, E. (1881). L'evolution de la typographie.Rev. Sci. 27, 802–813.Google Scholar
  52. Kinsbourne, M., and Warrington, E. K. (1962). A variety of reading disability associated with righ hemisphere lesions.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 25, 339–344.Google Scholar
  53. Kleist, J. (1934).Gehirn-Pathologie vornelnlich auf Grund der Kriegserfahrungen. Barth, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  54. Kolers, P. (1966). Reading and talking bilingually.Amer. J. Psych. 79, 357–376.Google Scholar
  55. Kolers, P. (1970). Three stages of reading. In Levin, H. and Williams, J. P. (eds.)Basic Studies in Reading Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Kuennapas, T. (1966). Visual perception of capital letters.Scand. J. Psych. 7, 189–196.Google Scholar
  57. Kussmaul, A. (1877).Die Störungen der Sprache. Vogel, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  58. Lhermitte, J., Lecours, A-R., and Ouvry, B. (1967). Essai d'analyse structurale des paralexies et des paragraphies.Acta Neurol. Psych. Belg. 67, 1021–1044.Google Scholar
  59. Luria, A. R. (1947).Traumatic Aphasia. English translation, 1970; Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  60. Luria, A. R. (1960). Differences between disturbances of speech and writing in Russian and in French.Internat. J. Slavic Linguis. Poetics 3, 13–22.Google Scholar
  61. Lyman, R. S., Kwan, S. T., and Chao, W. H. (1938). Left occipitoparietal brain tumor with observations on alexia and agraphia in Chinese and in English.The Chinese Med. J. 54, 491–516.Google Scholar
  62. Makita, K. (1968). The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children.Amer. J. Orthopsych.,38, 599–614.Google Scholar
  63. Marshall, J. C., and Newcombe, F. (1966). Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia.Neuropsychologia 4, 169–176.Google Scholar
  64. Marshall, M., Newcombe, F., and Marshall, J. C. (1970). The microstructure of word-finding difficulties in a dysphasic subject. In Flores d'Aracis, G.B. and Levelt, W. J. M. (eds.),Advances in Psycholinguistics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  65. Money, J., and Schiffman, G. (1966).The Disabled Reader: Education of the Dyslexic Child. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  66. Morton, J. (1964). A model for continuous language behaviour.Lang. Speech 7, 40–70.Google Scholar
  67. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychol. Rev. 76, 165–178.Google Scholar
  68. Newcombe, F. (1969).Missile Wounds of the Brain: A Study of Psychological Deficits. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  69. Newcombe, F., and Marshall, J. C. (1971). Word-retrieval in aphasia: Work in progress. In Tzavaras, A. (ed.),Current Trends in European Human Neuropsychology. Special issue ofInternat. J. Ment. Health.Google Scholar
  70. Orton, S. T. (1937).Reading, Writing and Speech Problems in Children, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  71. Pieron, H. (1923).Le Cerveau et la Pensée. Alcan, Paris.Google Scholar
  72. Poppelreuter, W. (1917).Die psychischen Schadigungen durch Kopfschuss in Kriege 1914–1916. Voss, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  73. Riegel, K. F., and Riegel, R. M. (1961). Prediction of word-recognition thresholds on the basis of stimulus parameters.Lang. Speech 4, 157–170.Google Scholar
  74. Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., and Sotsky, R. (1971). American children with reading problems can easily learn to read English represented by Chinese characters.Science 171, 1264–1267.Google Scholar
  75. Russell, W. R., and Espir, M. L. E. (1961).Traumatic Aphasia. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  76. Sanford, E. C. (1888). The relative legibility of the small letters.Amer. J. Psych. 1, 402–435.Google Scholar
  77. Sasanuma, S., and Fujimura, O. (1971). Selective impairment of phonetic and nonphonetic transcriptions of words in Japanese aphasic patients.Cortex 7, 1–18.Google Scholar
  78. Schuell, H. (1950). Paraphasia and Paralexia.J. Speech Hearing Dis. 15, 291–306.Google Scholar
  79. Siegel, G. M. (1959). Dysphasic speech responses to visual word stimuli.J. Speech Hear. Res. 2, 152–160.Google Scholar
  80. Simmel, M. L., and Goldschmidt, K. H. (1953). Prolonged posteclamptic aphasia.A.M.A. Archieves of Neurology and Psychiatry 69, 80–83.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, F. (1969). The use of featural dependencies across letters in the visual identification of words.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8, 215–218.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, F. (1971).Understanding Reading. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Thomsen, I. V., and Harmsen, P. (1968). Retraining in a case of agnosic alexia.Folia Phoniat. 20, 342–347.Google Scholar
  84. Thorner, H. (1929). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Psychologie des Lesens.Arch. Ges. Psych. 71, 127–164.Google Scholar
  85. Vernon, M. D. (1929). The errors made in reading.Medical Research Council Reports of the Committee upon the Physiology of Vision. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
  86. Vernon, M. D. (1931). Characteristics of proof reading.Brit. J. Psych. 21, 368–381.Google Scholar
  87. Vernon, M. D. (1957).Backwardness in Reading. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  88. Warrington, E. K., and Zangwill, O. L. (1957). A study of dyslexia.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 20, 208–215.Google Scholar
  89. Weigl, E., and Bierwisch, M. (1970). Neuropsychology and Linguistics: Topics of common research.Found. Lang 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
  90. Wernicke, C. (1874).Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Cohn and Weigert, Breslau.Google Scholar
  91. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition.Cog. Psych. 1, 59–87.Google Scholar
  92. Whitaker, H. (1969).On the Representation of Language in the Human Brain. UCLA: Working Papers in Phonetics, No. 12.Google Scholar
  93. Whitaker, H. (1971). Unsolicited nominalizations by aphasics: the plausibility of the Lexicalist model.Linguistics (in press).Google Scholar
  94. Woodworth, R. S. (1938).Experimental Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Zachrisson, R. (1931). Four hundred years of English spelling reform.Studia Neophilogica 4, 1–69.Google Scholar
  96. Zeitler, J. (1900). Tachistoskopische Untersuchungen uber das Lesen.Philosophische Studien 16, 380–463.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Marshall
    • 1
  • Freda Newcombe
    • 2
  1. 1.M.R.C. Speech and Communication UnitUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyThe Churchill HospitalOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations