Skip to main content
Log in

Auctioning incentive contracts: The common cost, independent types case

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laffont and Tirole (1987) analyzed the problem of a regulator that wants to select one ofn firms to carry out a single indivisible project when the firms have private and independent costs and have the possibility of an ex-post investment in (non-observable) effort to reduce the (observable) cost.

This paper generalizes the analysis to a model of common costs, unknown at the bidding stage, while keeping the assumption of independent types. I show that the main characteristics of the private costs model are kept in a common cost framework. I provide two mechanisms that may be used to implement the optimal contract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bikhchandani, Sushil, and John G. Riley. 1991. “Equilibria in Open Common Value Auctions.”Journal of Economic Theory 53(1): 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, Fernando. 1992a. “The Design of Multidimensional Auctions.” Working Paper WP#19-92, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • Branco, Fernando. 1992b. “Optimal Auctions of an Indivisible Good-Extending the Optimality of Standard Auctions.” Mimeo, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, James B., and Shmuel S. Oren. 1994. “Bidder Cost Revelation in Electric Power Auctions.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 6(1): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che, Yeon-Koo. 1993. “Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions.”Rand Journal of Economics 24(4): 668–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harstad, Ronald M., John Kagel, and Dan Levin. 1990. “Equilibrium Bidding Functions for Auctions with an Uncertain Number of Bidders.” Economics Letters 33(1): 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1987. “Auctioning Incentive Contracts.”Journal of Political Economy 95(5): 921–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1993.A Theory of Incentives in Regulation and Procurement. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, Eric, and John Riley. 1984. “Optimal Auctions with Risk Averse Buyers.”Econometrica 52(6): 1473–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, and John McMillan. 1986. “Bidding for Contracts: A Principal-Agent Analysis.”Rand Journal of Economics 17(3): 326–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, and John McMillan. 1987. “Competition for Agency Contracts.”Rand Journal of Economics 18(2): 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston, John McMillan, and Philip J. Reny. 1989. “Extracting the Surplus in the Common-Value Auction.”Econometrica 57(6): 1451–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul R., and Robert J. Weber. 1982. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.”Econometrica 50(5): 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, Roger B. 1979. “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem. “Econometrica 47(1): 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, Michael H., and David E. M. Sappington. 1987. “Awarding Monopoly Franchises.”American Economic Review 77(3): 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This is a much revised version of a part of chapter one of my Ph.D. dissertation. I would like to thank Drew Fudenberg, Oliver Hart, and two anonymous referees for their comments. I am especially indebted to Jean Tirole, who suggested this problem to me. I have also benefited from presentations at MIT and the EARIE 93 Meeting. Financial support from INVOTAN (grant 3/88/PO) is gratefully acknowledged. Remaining errors are my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branco, F. Auctioning incentive contracts: The common cost, independent types case. J Regul Econ 7, 277–292 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067098

Keywords

Navigation