Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between auditory discrimination and oral production of Spanish sounds in children and adults

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the question of age in relation to second-language learning. Specific variables investigated were the auditory discrimination and oral production of Spanish sounds. Two test were constructed: (1) The auditory discrimination test used minimal pairs of Spanish sounds, and (2) the oral production test used words that differed in only one sound. Both tests were given individually to a group of randomly chosen English monolingual speakers. A group of children (1 st-graders) and a group of adults (12th-graders) were tested to determine if both tests taken together would show one group to have a higher foreign language aptitude than the other group. While it was hypothesized that children would perform better than adults, the multivariate analysis of variance indicated that, with both tests taken together, adults were superior in auditory discrimination and oral production, supporting the idea that adults because of their cognitive advantage and maturity are more efficient and successful in these two aspects of foreign-language learning. Children did not exhibit the facility that early-foreign-language-learning advocates have postulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, J., & Garcia, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language.Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, J., & Price, B. (1967). The learning strategy of total physical response: Some age differences.Child Development, 38, 1219–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning?Language Learning, 24, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.W., Dietz, D.J., Fritz, R.K., Jenkins, E., Mazzetti, R., Posada, R, & Merryman, E. (1972). A testing of the audio-active voice reflector in the foreign language classroom.Modern Language Journal, 56, 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, R., & Sachs, J. (1979). Phonological learning by children and adults in a laboratory setting.Language and Speech, 22 (Part 2), 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathman, A. (1975). The relationship between age and second language productive ability.Language Learning, 25, 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiora, A.Z., Brannon, R.C., & Dull, C.Y. (1972). Empathy and second language learning.Language Learning, 22, 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.J. (1975).A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence.Language Learning, 23, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. (1975). The critical period for language acquisition and its possible bases.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D., Sferlazza, V., Feldman, L., & Fathman, A.K. (1976). Adult performance on the Slope Test: More evidence for a natural sequence in adult second language acquisition.Language Learning, 26, 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P. (1982)A course in phonetics. (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamendella, J.T. (1977). General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition.Language Learning, 27, 155–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E.H. (1967).Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, G.G. (1978). On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning.Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L., & Samuels, S.J. (1973). The relationship between age and accuracy of foreign language pronunciation.Journal of Education Research, 66, 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (1967). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. (1952–1953). A consideration of the neurophysiological mechanisms of speech and some educational consequences. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Daedalus, 82, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. (1959).Speech and brain mechanisms, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertz, D.L., & Bever, T.G. (1975). Sensitivity to phonological universals in children and adolescents.Language, 51, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, J.H. (1975). Affective factors and the problem of age in second language acquisition.Language Learning, 25, 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scovel, T. (1969). Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance.Language Learning, 19, 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H.W., Krashen, S.D., & Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent.Language Sciences, 36, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning.Child Development, 49, 1114–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H. (1976). Optimal age: Myth or reality?Canadian Modern Language Review, 32, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.P. (1974). Toward a theory of language acquisition.Language Learning, 24, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W.H., & Zangwill, O.L. (Eds.). (1961). Sensitive periods in learning of animals and men: A study of imprinting with special reference to the introduction of cyclic behavior. InCurrent problems in animal behavior. London: Cambridge Unversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winitz, H. (1981). Input considerations in the comprehension of first and second language.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winitz, H., & Bellerose, B. (1965). Phoneme-cluster learning as a function of instructional method and age.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a dissertation submitted by Alba A. Rosenman to the Department of Secondary, Higher, and Foundations of Education, Ball State University. The research was supported in part by a Graduate Student Research Grant from Ball State University. I am grateful to Dr. Larry Henriksen for his help in the statistical design and analysis of the data and to Dr. Herbert Stahlke for phonetic analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenman, A.A. The relationship between auditory discrimination and oral production of Spanish sounds in children and adults. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 517–534 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067082

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067082

Keywords

Navigation