Skip to main content

Autosomal and maternal effects on pupation behavior inDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract

This study demonstrates the importance of using a complete set of 16 reciprocal crosses (F1, backcrosses, and F2) to thoroughly investigate both genetic and nongenetic influences on patterns of inheritance of larval pupation behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Larvae derived from natural populations show significant variation in pupal height, defined as the distance a larva pupates above the feeding substrate. Differences in the distance a larva pupates from fruit in nature is known to affect the fitness ofDrosophila populations. In this study the heredity of pupal height is analyzed by performing crosses between high- and low-pupating strains. We found that the inheritance of pupal height fit a classical additive polygenic model of inheritance, with intermediate F1 pupal heights and greater variances in the F2 generation. In addition, a significant maternal effect was also found by analyzing the reciprocal backcrosses. Progeny with low-pupating mothers had lower pupation heights than those with low-pupating fathers. Similarly, progeny with high-pupating mothers tended to have higher pupal heights than those with high-pupating fathers. This maternal effect was not attributable to strain differences in permanent cytoplasmic factors, sex chromosomes, or developmental time. Finally, we speculate upon the environmental conditions under which a transient maternal effect on pupation behavior would be expected to evolve in natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Baker, B. (1973). The maternal and zygotic control of development by cinnamon, a new mutant inDrosophila melanogaster.Dev. Biol. 33:429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker, K., and Nelissen, F. (1963). On the relations between the duration of the larval and pupal period, weight and diurnal rhythm in emergence inDrosophila melanogaster.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 6:37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, S. J., and Sokolowski, M. B. (1984). Larval foraging behavior in isofemale lines ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. pseudoobscura.J. Hered. 75:131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, S. J., and Sokolowski, M. B. (1985). A genetic analysis of path length and pupation height in a natural population ofDrosophila melanogaster.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27:334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Belle, J. S., and Sokolowski, M. B. (1987). Heredity of rover/sitter: Alternative foraging strategies ofDrosophila melanogaster larvae.Heredity 59:73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Souza, H., Da Cunha, A., and Dos Santos, E. (1970). Adaptive polymorphism of behavior evolved in laboratory populations ofDrosophila willistoni.Am. Nat. 104:175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrman, L., and Parsons, P. (1981).Behavior Genetics and Evolution, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Bellido, A., and Del Prado, J. (1979). Genetic analysis of maternal information inDrosophila.Nature 278:346–348.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grun, P. (1976).Cytoplasmic Genetics and Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hay, D. (1972a). Behavioural rhythms in cultures of immatureD. melanogaster.Experientia 28:922–923.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hay, D. (1972b). Genetical and maternal determinants of the activity and preening behaviour ofDrosophila melanogaster reared in different environments.Heredity 28:311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hays, W. L. (1981).Statistics, 3rd ed., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, W., Seecof, W., Trout, W., and Pasternack, M. (1970). Production and relative frequency of maternally influenced lethals inDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 104:261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le Pape, G., and Lassalle, J. (1981). Maternal effects in mice: Influence of parents' and offsprings' genotypes.Behav. Genet. 11:367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luning, K. (1983). Genetics of inbredDrosophila melanogaster. X. Maternal and cytoplasmic effects of recombination.Hereditas 99:57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahowald, A., Caulton, J., and Gehring, W. (1979). Ultrastructural studies of oocytes and embryos derived from female flies carrying the grandchildless mutation inDrosophila subobscura.Dev. Biol. 69:118–132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohler, J. (1977). Developmental genetics of theDrosophila egg. I. Identification of 59 sexlinked cistrons with maternal effects on embryonic development.Genetics 85:259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Okada, M., Kleinman, I., and Schneiderman, H. (1974). Repair of a genetically-caused defect in oogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster by transplantation of cytoplasm from wildtype eggs and by injection of pyrimidine nucleotides.Dev. Biol. 37:55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SAS Institute (1985).SAS User's Guide: Statistics, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schnebel, E. M., and Grossfield, J. (1986). The influence of light on pupation height inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 16:407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sokal, R., Ehrlich, P., Hunter, P., and Schlager, G. (1960). Some factors affecting pupation site ofDrosophila.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53:174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sokolowski, M. B. (1985). Genetics and ecology ofDrosophila melanogaster larval foraging and pupation behaviour.J. Insect. Physiol. 31:857–864.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sokolowski, M. B., and Hansell, R. I. C. (1983). Elucidating the behavioral phenotype ofDrosophila melanogaster larvae: Correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height.Behav. Genet. 13:267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sokolowski, M. B., Kent, C., and Wong, J. (1984).Drosophila larval foraging behaviour: Developmental stages.Anim. Behav. 32:645–651.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sonnenblick, B. P. (1950). The early embryology ofDrosophila melanogaster. In Demerec, M. (ed.),Biology of Drosophila, Hafner, New York, pp. 62–167.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spurway, H. (1948). Genetics and cytology ofDrosophila subobscura. IV. An extreme example of delay in gene action, causing sterility.J. Genet. 49:126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wahlsten, D. (1979). A critique of the concepts of heritability and heredity in behavioral genetics. In Royce, J. R., and Mos, L. (eds.),Theoretical advances in behavioral genetics, Sijthoff and Nordhoff, Germantown, pp. 425–481.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wakasugi, N. (1973). Studies on fertility of DDK mice: reciprocal crosses between DDK and C57BL/6J strains and experimental transplantation of the ovary.J. Reprod. Fert. 33:283–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a University Research Fellowship and Operating Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council to M. B. Sokolowski. S. J. Bauer was the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, S.J., Sokolowski, M.B. Autosomal and maternal effects on pupation behavior inDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 18, 81–97 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067077

Download citation

Key Words

  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • pupation behavior
  • maternal effect
  • heredity
  • natural selection