Abstract
The informativeness of different relationships for resolving the genetic and cultural transmission of a continuous variable is explored by computer simulation. Extended twin, extended nuclear-family, and adoption designs are considered. Combining data on twin and parent-offspring pairs provides a powerful means of detecting genetic and cultural transmission. The addition of uncle-nephew and first-cousin data sometimes leads to an increase in power. Designs involving monozygotic twin pairs and their offspring are weaker. The most powerful adoption designs involve data on both biological parent-adopted-away offspring and adoptive parent-adopted offspring pairs. In the absence of information about biological parents, combining nuclear-family, adoptive parent-adopted offspring, and adoptive/natural sibling relationships still provides a powerful strategy for hypothesis testing. Adoption designs are more robust than extended twin and extended nuclear-family designs for resolving cultural and biological inheritance in the presence of genetic dominance or phenotypic assortative mating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burks, B. S. (1928). The relative influence of nature and nurture upon mental development: A comparative study of foster parent-foster child resemblance and true parent-true child resemblance.Twenty-Seventh Yearbook Natl. Soc. Study Educ. 27:9–38.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. (1973). Cultural versus biological inheritance: Phenotypic transmission from parents to child.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:618–637.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. (1981).Cultural Transmission and Evolution: a Quantitative Approach, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J..
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Feldman, M. W., Chen, K. H., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission.Science 218:19–27.
Cloninger, C. R. (1980). Interpretation of intrinsic and extrinsic structural relations by path analysis: Theory and applications to assortative mating.Genet. Res. 36:135–145.
Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979a). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. II. A general model of combined polygenic and cultural inheritance.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:176–198.
Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979b). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. III. Family structure and the analysis of experiments.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:366–388.
Eaves, L. J. (1976a). A model for sibling effects in man.Heredity 36:205–214.
Eaves, L. J. (1976b). The effect of cultural transmission on continuous variation.Heredity 37:41–57.
Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52:399–433.
Galton, F. (1883).Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, Macmillan, London.
Greig, D. M. (1980).Optimisation, Longman, London.
Hayley, C. S., and Last, K. (1981). The advantages of analyzing human variation using twins and twin half-sibs and cousins.Heredity 47:221–236.
Heath, A. C. (1983). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1985). Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection.Behav. Genet. 15:15–30.
Horn, J. M., Loehlin, J. C., and Willerman, L. (1979) Intellectual resemblance among adoptive and biological relatives: The Texas adoption project.Behav. Genet. 9:177–207.
Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.
Joreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika 43:443–477.
Leahy, A. M. (1935). Nature-nurture and intelligence.Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 17:4.
Loehlin, J. C. (1978). Heredity-environment analyses of Jenck's IQ correlations.Behav. Genet. 8:415–426.
Lytton, H. (1977). Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins?Dev. Psychol. 13:456–459.
Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study.Heredity 40:97–116.
Nance, W. E., and Corey, L. A. (1976). Genetic models for the analysis of data from the families of identical twins.Genetics 83:811–826.
Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N., and Holzinger, K. J. (1937).Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Numerical Algorithms Group (NAG) (1978).Fortran Library Manual, Mark 7, NAG, Oxford.
Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O. (Eds.) (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., and Yee, S. (1976). Resolution of cultural and biological inheritance by path analysis.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 28:228–242.
Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., Elston, R. C., and Yee, S. (1977). Causal analysis of academic performance.Behav. Genet. 77:147–159.
Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., and Cloninger, C. R. (1979). Path analysis under generalized assortative mating. I. Theory.Genet. Res. 33:187–198.
Rice, J., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1978). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30:618–643.
Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients.Ann. Math. Stat. 5:161–215.
Wright, S. (1968).Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 1, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research reported in this paper was supported by Grants GM30250, GM32732, and AG04954 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heath, A.C., Kendler, K.S., Eaves, L.J. et al. The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: Informativeness of different relationships. Behav Genet 15, 439–465 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066238
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066238