Skip to main content
Log in

Operant discrimination learning and operant bar-pressing rates in inbred and heterogeneous laboratory mice

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mice from four inbred strains and a heterogeneous line were first reduced to 90% of theirad libitum body weight and were then trained to press a bar to obtain food pellets. After 9 days of training with a continuous schedule of reinforcement (CRF), mice were required to discriminate between conditions of reward and nonreward as indicated by a tone and a light; discrimination training continued for 21 days. Considerable genetic variation was apparent for asymptotic pressing rates under CRF as well as discrimination performance. However, the highest discrimination ratios were achieved by mice with the lowest pressing rates. Results are discussed in terms of associative and nonassociative processes which may contribute to genetic variation in performance on learning tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpern, H., and Marriott, J. (1972). An analysis of short term memory and conceptual behavior in three inbred strains of mice.Behav. Biol. 7:543–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman, H. (1974). Differential effects of scopolamine andd-amphetamine on avoidance behaviors in three strains of mice. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Barrett, R. J., Leith, N. J., and Ray, O. S. (1973). A behavioral and pharmacological analysis of variables mediating active-avoidance behavior in rats.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82:489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman, M. E., and Schoel, W. M. (1970). Instrumental, learning in animals: Parameters of reinforcement.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 21:367–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, R. C. (1967).Theory of Motivation, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, P. L. (1969). Brain-acetylcholine and inhibition. In Tapp, J. T. (ed.).Reinforcement and Behavior, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. L. (1970). Strain differences in effects of chlorpromazine and chlordiazepoxide upon active and passive avoidance in mice.Psychopharmacologia 16:261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrick, C. L. (1967). Learning and retention of a light contingent bar press response for three inbred strains of mice.J. Psychol. 67:191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, G. A. (1961).Hilgard and Marquis Conditioning and Learning. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn, G. E., Wilson, J. R., and Meredith, W. (1970). The use of isogenic and heterogenic mouse stocks in behavioral research. In Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliverio, A., Castellano, C., and Messeri, P., (1972). A genetic analysis of avoidance, maze and wheel running behaviors in the mouse.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 79:459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliverio, A., Castellano, C., and Messeri, P. (1973). Genotype-dependent effects of septal lesions on different types of learning in the mouse.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82:240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padeh, B. (1972). A genetic analysis of operant discrimination learning and brain size in inbred and heterogeneous strains of laboratory mice. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado.

  • Schlesinger, K., and Wimer, R. (1967). Genotype and conditioned avoidance learning in the mouse.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 63:139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. L. (1970). Trial-and-error behaviour inbred and F1 hybrid mice.Anim. Behav. 18:445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C. H., and Clark, L. H. (1968). Interstrain differences in aggressive behavior and exploratory activity of inbred mice.Commun. Behav. Biol. 1:49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, P. (1966). The use of operant methods in the assessment and control of motivational states. In Honig, W. K. (ed.),Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D. (1972a). Phenotypic and genetic relations between initial response to electric shock and rate of avoidance learning in mice.Behav. Genet. 2:211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D. (1972b). Genetic experiments with animal learning: A critical review.Behav. Biol. 7:143–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D. (1973). Contributions of the genes albinism (c) and retinal degeneration (rd) to a strain-by-training procedures interaction in avoidance learning.Behav. Genet. 3:303–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by NIGMS grant GM-14547 to the Institute for Behavioral Genetics University of Colorado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paden, B., Wahlsten, D. & DeFries, J.C. Operant discrimination learning and operant bar-pressing rates in inbred and heterogeneous laboratory mice. Behav Genet 4, 383–393 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066158

Key Words

Navigation