Abstract
An experiment involving trios of juvenile mice of two inbred strains (C57/ BL/6 and 129/SV) was used to test for effects of interaction between strains on levels of exploratory/agonistic behavior and on the form of asymmetric social relations. Each trio consisted of two same-sexfull siblings from the same litter and a third, unfamiliar individual (the “stranger”) which was of the same sex as the siblings and was either of the same strain as the siblings or of the other strain. Levels of exploratory/ agonistic behavior between the siblings and the stranger, both in the initial encounter and after 3 or more days, were higher in mixed-strain trios than in same-strain trios, and hierarchies formed on the basis of these behaviors were significantly more linear in mixed-strain trios than in same-strain trios. Although some absolute differences between the strains were detectable, the most marked behavioral differences were between mixed-strain and same-strain trios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K., and Boyse, E. A. (1985). The chemosensory recognition of genetic individuality.Sci. Am. 253:86–92.
Clarke, L. H., and Schein, M. W. (1966). Activities associated with conflict behaviour in mice.Anim. Behav. 14:44–49.
Gilder, P. M., and Slater, P. J. B. (1978). Interest of mice in conspecific male odours is influenced by degree of kinship.Nature 274:364–365.
Ginsburg, B., and Alee, W. C. (1942). Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice.Physiol. Zool. 15:485–506.
Grau, H. J. (1982). Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus).Anim. Behav. 30:497–505.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II.J. Theoret. Biol. 7:1–16, 17–52.
Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., and Cartwright, D. (1965).Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, Wiley, New York.
Hayashi, S., and Kimura, T. (1983). Degree of kinship as a factor regulating preference among conspecifics in mice.Anim. Behav. 31:81–85.
Hepper, P. G. (1983). Sibling recognition in the rat.Anim. Behav. 31:1177–1191.
Holmes, W. G. (1984). Sibling recognition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels: Effects of genetic relatedness, rearing association, and olfaction.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14:225–233.
Holmes, W. G. (1986a). Kin recognition by phenotype matching in female Belding's ground squirrels.Anim. Behav. 34:38–47.
Holmes, W. G. (1986b). Indentification of paternal half-siblings by captive Belding's ground squirrels.Anim. Behav.,34:321–327.
Kareem, A. M. (1983). Effect of increasing periods of familiarity on social interactions between male sibling mice.Anim. Behav. 31:919–926.
Kareem, A. M., and Barnard, C. J. (1982). The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice.Anim. Behav. 30:594–601.
Kareem, A. M., and Barnard, C. J. (1986). Kin recognition in mice: Age, sex, and parental effects.Anim. Behav. 34:1814–1824.
Landau, H. G. (1951a). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies. I. Effect of inherent characteristics.Bull. Math. Biophys. 13:1–19.
Landau, H. G. (1951b). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies. II. Some effects of possible social factors.Bull. Math. Biophys. 13:254–262.
Landau, H. G. (1968). Models of social structure.Bull. Math. Biophys. 30:215–224.
Lennington, S., and Egid, K. (1985). Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the t locus: A response to t-locus or H-2 variability?Behav. Genet. 15:53–69.
Lindman, H. R. (1974).Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs, Freeman, San Francisco.
MacKintosh, J. H. (1981). Behaviour of the house mouse.Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 47:337–365.
Porter, R. H., and Wyrick, M. (1979). Sibling recognition in spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus): Influence of age and isolation.Anim. Behav. 27:761–766.
Porter, R. H., Wyrick, M., and Pankey, J. (1978). Sibling recognition on spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3:61–68.
Porter, R. H., Matochik, J. A., and Makin, J. W. (1986). Discrimination between full-sibling spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) by olfactory signatures.Anim. Behav. 34:1182–1188.
SAS Institute (1982).SAS User's Guide: Statistics, SAS, Cary, N.C.
Singh, P. B., Brown, R. E., and Roser, B. (1987). MHC antigens in urine as olfactory recognition cues.Nature 327:161–164.
Taylor, B. A. (1972). Genetic relationships between inbred strains of mice.J. Hered. 63:83–86.
Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Egorov, I. K., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A. (1983). Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bm1 mutant mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:5685–5688.
Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Matsuzuki, O., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A. (1986). Participation of mouse X and Y chromosomes in genetically determined chemosensory identity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:9438–9440.
Yanai, J., and McClearn, G. E. (1973). Assortative mating in mice. II. Strain differences in female mating preference, male preference, and the question of possible sexual selection.Behavior Genetics 3:65–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted while the author was supported by an NSF NATO Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, A.L. Interaction between strains in the social relations of inbred mice. Behav Genet 19, 685–700 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066031
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066031