Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling regulatory behavior: The economic theory of regulation versus alternative theories and simple rules of thumb

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical tests of the economic theory of regulation have typically consisted of estimation of a model of some observed regulatory decision, with various interest group variables incorporated as exogenous determinants of that decision. Statistical significance of the coefficients of these interest group variables is then taken as empirical support for this theory. Here, a different approach is adopted. We specify seven alternative models based upon: (1) the economic theory of regulation, (2) alternative theories of regulatory behavior, and (3) simple rules of thumb. Model selection tests are then performed. Our findings reveal that the economic theory of regulation consistently outperforms the alternative models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W. J., and R. E. Quandt. 1964. “Rules of Thumb and Optimally Imperfect Decisions”.American Economic Review 54 (March): 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., and T. G. MacKinnon. 1981. “Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses”.Econometrica 49: 781–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. R., and M. C. Munger. 1989. “The Rationality of Idealogy”.Journal of Law and Economics 32 (April): 119–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, R. L., and B. T. Ratchford. 1978. “Some Determinants of Allowed Rates of Return on Equity to Electric Utilities”.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 9:46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiran, H., D. R. Kamerschen., and J. B. Legler. 1986. “The Economic and Political Determinants of the Requested-Granted Rate of Return”, inTelecommunications in the Post-Divestiture Era, A. L. Danielsen and D. R. Kamerschen, eds., Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, B. G., D. L. Kaserman., and F. Melese. 1988. “Rent Seeking and the Allowed Rate of Return: A Recursive Model”.Review of Industrial Organization 3 (Fall): 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, B. G., D. L. Kaserman., and F. Melese. 1989. “Endogenous Regulation and the Firm's Regulatory Expenditures”.Applied Economics 21: 375–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. 1972. “The Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Hearing”.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5: 335–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J. P., and M. A. Zupan. 1984. “Capture and Idealogy in the Economic Theory of Politics”.American Economic Review 74 (June): 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J. P., and M. A. Zupan. 1990. “The Apparent Idealogical Behavior of Legislators: Testing for Principal-Agent Slack in Political Institutions”.Journal of Law and Economics 33 (April): 103–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaserman, D. L., L. R. Kavanaugh., and R. C. Tepel. 1984. “To Which Fiddle Does the Regulator Dance? Some Empirical Evidence”.Review of Industrial Organization 1:246–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaserman, D. L., J. W. Mayo., and J. E. Flynn. 1990. “Cross-Subsidization in Telecommunications: Beyond the Universal Service Fairy Tale”.Journal of Regulatory Economics 2 (September): 231–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., and P. H. Rubin. 1979. “Self-Interest, Idealogy, and Logrolling in Congressional Voting”.Journal of Law and Economics 22 (October): 365–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1988.Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizon, G. E., and J. F. Richard. 1986. “The Encompassing Principle and Its Application to Testing Nonnested Hypotheses”.Econometrica 54: 657–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish, H. F. 1990. “The Near Optimality of Mark-Up Pricing”.Economic Inquiry 28 (July): 555–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”,Journal of Law and Economics 19:211–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation”.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5: 335–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. B., G. S. Madalla., and G. Enholm. 1978. “Determinants of the Requested Rate of Return and the Rate of Return Granted in a Formal Regulatory Process”.Bell Journal of Economics 9 (Autumn): 611–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation”.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R., and M. J. Moran. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policy Making by the Federal Trade Commission”.Journal of Political Economy 91 (October): 765–800.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caudill, S.B., Im, BG. & Kaserman, D.L. Modeling regulatory behavior: The economic theory of regulation versus alternative theories and simple rules of thumb. J Regul Econ 5, 251–262 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065953

Keywords

Navigation