Behavior Genetics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 103–114 | Cite as

Estimating genetic correlations from inbred strains

  • Joseph P. Hegmann
  • Bernard Possidente
Article

Abstract

Genetic correlations measure the extent of pleiotropic effects of polygenes on pairs of characters or the closeness of linkage between sets of loci influencing the traits and held in allelic (gametic) disequilibrium. Their importance for research lies primarily in predicting correlated responses of one trait to selection based on values for another, and secondarily in analyzing the complex organization of biological systems. Genetic correlations appear to limit the rate and set the direction of multivariate evolution. In view of this, efficient methods for estimating genetic correlations may be essential for understanding the role of behavior in adaptation and for predicting behavioral change in evolution. In this paper we present methods for the estimation of genetic correlations from inbred strain comparisons. Estimates from inbred strains are relatively easy to obtain and appear to be valid when compared to those derived from more demanding parent-offspring comparisons and to correlated responses to selection.

Key Words

inbred lines genetic correlations heritability estimation mice prediction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blizard, D. W., and Bailey, D. W. (1979). Genetic correlation between open-field activity and defecation: Analysis with the CXB recombinant inbred strains.Behav. Genet.,9:349–357.Google Scholar
  2. Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. (1970).An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  3. DeFries, J. C., and Hegmann, J. P. (1970). Genetic analysis of open-field behavior. In Lindzey, G., and Theissen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 23–56.Google Scholar
  4. Dickerson, G. E. (1959). Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. InTechniques and Procedures in Animal Production Research, American Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrman, L., and Parsons, P. A. (1976).The Genetics of Behavior, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  6. Falconer, D. S. (1960).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Hegmann, J. P. (1972). Physiological function and behavioral genetics. I. Genetic variance for peripheral conduction velocity in mice.Behav. Genet. 2:55–67.Google Scholar
  8. Hegmann, J. P. (1975). The response to selection for altered conduction velocity in mice.Behav. Biol. 13:413–423.Google Scholar
  9. Hegmann, J. P., White, J. E., and Kater, S. B. (1973). Physiological function and behavioral genetics. II. Quantitative genetic analysis of conduction velocity of caudal nerves of the mouse.Mus musculus.Behav. Genet. 3:121–131.Google Scholar
  10. Lande, R. (1976). Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution.Evolution 30:314–334.Google Scholar
  11. Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain-body size allometry.Evolution 33:402–416.Google Scholar
  12. McClearn, G. E., Wilson, J. R., and Meredith, W. (1970). The use of isogenic and heterogenic mouse stocks in behavioral research. In Lindzey, G., and Theissen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  13. Osborne, R., and Paterson, W. S. B. (1952). On the sampling variance of heritability estimates derived from variance analyses.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh S. 64:456–461.Google Scholar
  14. Pittendrigh, C. S., and Daan, S. (1976). A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. IV. Pacemaker as clock.J. Comp. Physiol. 106:291–331.Google Scholar
  15. Possidente, B., and Hegmann, J. P. (1980). Circadian complexes: Circadian rhythms under common gene control.J. Comp. Physiol. 139:121–125.Google Scholar
  16. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1969).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  17. Wright, S. (1966). Polyallelic random drift in relation in evolution.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 55:1074–1080.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph P. Hegmann
    • 1
  • Bernard Possidente
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology Department and Genetics ProgramUniversity of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations