Skip to main content
Log in

Male-male interactions and mating kinetics inDrosophila

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male-male interaction (K) has been estimated from data on the attrition rate of virgin females per minute in a study of the mating kinetics inDrosophila. K is expressed as the time males expend on other males relative to that expended while searching for, courling, and copulating with females. The value of K in these studies ranged from 0 (approximately) to. 695; it was affected both by strain (sepia orebony D. melanogaster and wild-typeD. simulans) and by size of the mating chamber. Host-parasitoid models of ecologists appear to be appropriate for examining mating kinetics inDrosophila.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cobb, M., Burnet, B., and Connally, K. (1986). The structure of courtship in theDrosophila melanogaster species subgroup.Behaviour 97:182–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. (1986). Courtship sounds and behaviour in the four species of theDrosophila bipectinata complex.Anim. Behav. 34:1146–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowse, H. B., Ringo, J. M., and Barton, K. M. (1986). A model describing the kinetics of mating inDrosophila.J. Theor. Biol. 121:173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstrand, I. A., and Seiger, M. B. (1975). Population density and mating rates inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution 29:287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P. (1978).The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1959). Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism.Can. Entomol. 91:385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.-M. (1984). A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating.Behav. Genet. 14:411–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.-M. and David, J. R. (1987). Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of theDrosophila melanogaster subgroup.Evolution 41:294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K. (1980). Genetic variations of courtship song ofDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Jap. J. Genet. 55:235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K. (1981). Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference inDrosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, and their hybrids.Evolution 35:1128–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C. P., and Hall, J. C. (1982). The function of courtship song rhythms inDrosophila.Animal Behav. 30:794–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A. (1987). Behavioral and sensory basis of courtship success inDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:6200–6204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., and Hanson, S. J. (1981). Multivariate analysis ofDrosophila courtship.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J. M., Dowse, H. B., and Barton, K. M. (1987). Courtship behavior and the kinetics of mating in three lines ofDrosophila simulans and their hybrids.Behav. Genet. 17:141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. H., and Bartell, R. J. (1970). Role of a volatile sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 18:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1952). Mating behavior within the genusDrosophila (Diptera).Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99:399–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1982). Behavioral biology and evolution of the Hawaiian picture-winged species group ofDrosophila.Evol. Biol. 14:351–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. (1915). Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection inDrosophila.J. Anim. Behav. 5:351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. E. (1975). Differences in mating propensities: Some models for examining the genetic consequences.Behav. Genet. 5:381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1985). Mating kinetics inDrosophila.Behav. Sci. 30:149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbergen, P., Van Dijken, F. R., and Scharloo, W. (1987). Collation of courtship behavior of the sympatric speciesDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Behaviour 101:253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Ringo, J. M., and Johnson, L. L. (1980). Analysis of courtship sequences of the hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 10:459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawistowski, S., and Richmond, R. C. (1986). Inhibition of courtship and mating ofDrosophila melanogaster by the male-produced lipid,cis-vacceryl acetate.J. Insect Physiol. 32:189–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work reported here was supported by Grant GM34576, National Institute of General Medical Science, U.S. Public Health Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, B. Male-male interactions and mating kinetics inDrosophila . Behav Genet 20, 405–421 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065566

Key Words

Navigation