Abstract
Social aggregations of three cattle breeds and crosses between them were studied under controlled conditions at a Brazilian research station. Cows raised with animals of their own breed in isolation from other breeds maintained segregated social gruops. Cattle of the same breed raised apart formed aggregations based more on familiarity than on genetic communality. There were breed differences in both of those tendencies. Hybrids were no more likely to associate with cattle with which they had one breed in common than with animals of completely different breeds, although having two breeds in common increased the likelihood that hybrids would be found together. Recently weaned calves did not assort themselves by shared kinship, but they formed phenotypic groupings correlated with color. In the absence of familiar individuals, cattle may use familiar phenotypes in establishing social preferences and cohesive herds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bekoff, M. (1981). Mammalian sibling interactions. Genes, facilitative environments, and the coefficient of familiarity. In Gubernick, D. J., and Klopfer, P. H. (eds.),Parental Care in Mammals, Plenum, New York.
Bernstein, I. S. (1988). Kinship and behavior in nonhuman primates.Behav. Genet. 18:511–524.
Blaustein, A. R. (1988). Ecological correlates and potential functions of kin recognition and kin association in Anuran larvae.Behav. Genet. 18:449–464.
Blaustein, A. R., Porter, R. H., and Breed, M. D. (1988). Kin recognition in animals: Empirical evidence and conceptual issues.Behav. Genet. 18:405–407.
da Costa Marques, D. (1976).Criacão de Bovinos, Livraria Nobel, São Paulo.
Greenberg, L. (1988). Kin recognition in the sweat bee,Lasioglossium zephyrum Behav. Genet. 18:425–438.
Hepper, P. G. (1986). Kin recognition: Functions and mechanisms—a review.Biol. Rev. 61:63–93.
Holmes, W. G., and Sherman, P. W. (1980). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels.Am. Zool. 22:491–517.
MacKenzie, M. M., McGrew, W. C., and Chamove, A. S. (1985). Social preferences in stumptailed macaques (Macaca arctoides): Effects of companionship, kinship, and rearing.Develop. Psychobiol. 18:115–123.
Murphey, R. M. (1990). Social aggregations in cattle. I. Segregation by breed in free-ranging herds.Behav. Genet. 20:341–354.
Murphey, R. M., Duarte, F. A. M., and Torres Penedo, M. C. (1980). Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: Breed comparisons and a breed X treatments analysis.Behav. Genet. 10:173–183.
Murphey, R. M., Ruiz-Miranda, C. R., and Duarte, F. A. M. (in press). Maternal recognition in Gyr (Bos indicus) calves.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
Porter, R. H. (1987). Kin recognition: Functions and mediating mechanisms. In Crawford, C., Smith, M., and Krebs, D. (eds.),Sociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues and Applications, Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J.
Porter, R. H. (1988). The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: Superfamily Muroidea.Behav. Genet. 18:483–494.
Rouse, J. E. (1970).World Cattle I: Cattle of Europe, South America, Australia, and New Zealand, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
Rushton, J. P., Russell, R. J. H., and Wells, P. A. (1984). Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selection.Behav. Genet. 14:179–193.
Schloeth, R. (1961). Das Socialleben des Camargue-Rindes. Qualitative und quantitative Untersuchungen über die sozialen Beziehungen—insbesondere die soziale Rangordnung—das halbwilden französischen Kamprrindes.Z. Tierpsychol. 18:574–627.
Waldman, B. (1987). Mechanisms of kin recognition.J. Theor. Biol. 128:159–185.
Wallace, A. R. (1889).Darwinism. An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection with Some of Its Applications (2nd ed.), Macmillan, London.
Wilson, E. O. (1987). Kin recognition: An introductory synopsis. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, Wiley, Chichester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphey, R.M., de Moura Duarte, F.A. Social aggregations in cattle. II. Contributions of familiarity and genetic similarity. Behav Genet 20, 355–368 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065563
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065563