Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate path analysis of cognitive ability measures in reading-disabled and control nuclear families and twins

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Matrix notation is used to formulate a multivariate path model of familial resemblance in nuclear families, monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs, and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. The model incorporates multivariate genetic and environmental influences, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and environmental influences shared by offspring, and it permits the estimation of genetic and environmental correlations. The model is applied to data from nuclear families, MZ twin pairs, and DZ twin pairs in which at least one child was diagnosed as being reading disabled and to data from control families and twins. Three cognitive ability measures (Reading, Coding Speed, and Spatial Ability) were analyzed simultaneously. Results indicate that genetic influences are moderate, with significant genetic correlations among characters. Cultural transmission is negligible, as are the environmental correlations. Assortative mating is significant only for the Reading measure. There is no evidence for sibling shared environmental influences; however, there are significant twin shared environmental effects for each measure but not between measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aman, M. G., and Singh, N. N. (1983). Specific reading disorders: Concepts of etiology reconsidered. In Gadow, K. D., and Bailer, I. (eds.),Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol. II, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. A. (1983).Bivariate Path Analysis of Verbal and Non-Verbal Abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1984).Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equations Approach, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. L. (1975). Developmental dyslexia: Neurological aspects. In Friedlander, W. J. (ed.),Advances in Neurology, Vol. VII, Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1968). Components of heritable variation in mental test scores. In Vandenberg, S. G. (ed.),Progress in Human Behavior Genetics, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R. M. (1983). A multivariate genetic analysis of ridge count data from the offspring of monozygotic twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 32:161–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CERN (1977). MINUIT:A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletto, G. M. D. D., Krieger, H., and Magalhaes, J. R. (1981). Estimates of the genetical and environmental determinants of serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in Brazilian twins.Hum. Hered. 31:232–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. N., and DeFries, J. C. (1980). Cognitive abilities in families with reading disabled children.J. Learn. Disabil. 13:517–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., and Markwardt, F. C. (1970).Examiner's Manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, J. M. (1978). Genetic considerations in dyslexia. In Myklebust, H. R. (ed.),Progress in Learning Disabilities, Vol. IV, Grune and Stratton, New York, pp. 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, J. M., Guthrie, J. T., Childs, A. L., Abbey, H., and Childs, B. (1976). The genetics of specific reading disability.Ann. Hum. Genet. 40:1–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W., Baker, L. A., and Bock, R. D. (1983). Estimating components of covariance using LISREL.Data Anal. 1:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, B. (1950). Specific dyslexia (“congenital word-blindness”): A clinical and genetic study.Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand. 65:1–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, L. N. (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indices.Genetics 28:476–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, M. (1978). Dyslexia revisited: A review.Hum. Genet. 40:115–134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical genetic, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory factor analysis.Psychometrika 34:183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1981).LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood (Version V), International Educational Services, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., and Osborne, R. H. (1961). The interpretation of twin data.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 13:320–329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewitter, F. I., DeFries, J. C., and Elston, R. C. (1980). Genetic models of reading disability.Behav. Genet. 10:9–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1968). Genetic and environmental components in the covariation of cognitive abilities: An additive model. In Vandenberg, S. G. (ed.),Progress in Human Behavior Genetics, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, C. L., and Cooper, J. A. (1983). Genetic aspects of speech and language disorders: Current status and future directions. In Ludlow, C. L., and Cooper, J. A. (eds.),Genetic Aspects of Speech and Language Disorders, Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1977). The genetical analysis of covariance structure.Heredity 38:79–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M., Rao, D. C., Reich, T., Laskarzewski, P., Glueck, C. G., and Russell, J. M. (1983). The Cincinnati Lipid Research Clinic family study: Bivariate path analysis of lipoprotein concentrations.Genet. Res. 41:117–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1984). A bivariate path analysis of fear data on twins and their parents.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:273–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Op't Hof, J., and Guldenpfennig, W. M. (1972). Dominant inheritance of specific reading disability.South Afr. Med. J. 46:737–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. R., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1978). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary model.Am J. Hum. Genet. 30:618–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1980). Analysis of behavioral traits in the presence of cultural transmission and assortative mating: Applications to IQ and SES.Behav. Genet. 10:73–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, B. (1983). The identification and prevalence of specific reading retardation.Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 33:369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Research Associates (1965).Primary Mental Abilities: Technical Report, SRA, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladen, B. K. (1970). Inheritance of dyslexia.Bull. Orton Soc. 20:30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. D., Kimberling, W. J., Pennington, B. F., and Lubs, H. A. (1983). Specific reading disability: Identification of an inherited form through linkage analysis.Science 219:1345–1347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symmes, J. S., and Rapoport, J. L. (1972). Unexpected reading failure.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 42:82–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1905). Congenital word-blindness and its treatment.Ophthalmoscope 3:380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G. (1965). Innate abilities, one or many? A new method and some results.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 14:41–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, G. P. (1985). Multivariate path analysis of familial resemblance.Genet. Epidemiol. 2:35–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, G. P., and DeFries, J. C. (1985). Bivariate path analysis of familial resemblance for reading ability and symbol processing speed.Behav. Genet. 15:111–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, G. P., and Fulker, D. W. (1983). Familial resemblance for educational attainment.Behav. Genet. 13:341–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. I. (1974).Examiner's Manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised, Psychological Corp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1918). On the nature of size factors.Genetics 3:367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients.Ann. Math. Stat. 5:161–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahalkova, M., Vrzal, V., and Kloboukova, E, (1972). Genetical investigations in dyslexia.J. Med. Genet. 9:48–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbin-Rüdin, E. (1967). Congenital word-blindness.Bull. Orton Soc. 7:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the Spencer Foundation and the NICHD (HD-11681) to J. C. DeFries and by NIMH Postdoctoral Training Grant MH-17104.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogler, G.P., DeFries, J.C. Multivariate path analysis of cognitive ability measures in reading-disabled and control nuclear families and twins. Behav Genet 16, 89–106 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065481

Key Words

Navigation