Skip to main content
Log in

An application of water-in-oil and gelatin-microsphere-in-oil emulsions to specific delivery of anticancer agent into stomach lymphatics

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of water-in-oil (W/O) and gelatin-microsphere-in-oil (W/O-G) emulsions as drug delivery systems for achieving specificity into lymphatics was evaluated in the rat stomach. Following injection into the stomach wall, radioactivities of131I-labeled o-iodohippuric acid (IH, watersoluble model compound) and [14C]tripalmitin (TP, tracer of oil) in blood, regional lymph nodes, thoracic lymph, and stomach were determined. Since increased transfer of TP indicated the facilitation of lymphatic transport of IH following injection of W/O and W/O-G emulsions, the existence of a special transport mechanism through which drug and oil are delivered together was confirmed for this injection site. W/O and W/O-G emulsions increased the concentration-time curve (AUC) of IH in the regional lymph nodes (1.7 and 5.5 times that of aqueous solution injection, respectively), so the improvement of bioavailability was accomplished. In addition, a prolonged release of IH and decrease of its maximum blood concentration were obtained following injection of W/O-G emulsion. These results suggest that W/O and W/O-G emulsions satisfy many of the criteria of an ideal drug delivery system for cancer chemotherapy. An abundant supply of lymphatic vessels in the stomach wall exhibited the efficiency of these delivery systems more clearly than did thigh muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Nakamoto, M. Fujiwara, T. Noguchi, T., Kimura, S. Muranishi, and H. Sezaki. Studies on pharmaceutical modification of anticancer agents. I. Enhancement of lymphatic transport of mitomycin C by parenteral emulsions.Chem. Pharm. Bull. 23:2232–2238 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Nakamoto, M. Hashida, S. Muranishi, and H. Sezaki. Studies on pharmaceutical modification of anticancer agents. II. Enhanced delivery of bleomycin into lymph by emulsions and drying emulsions.Chem. Pharm. Bull. 23:3125–3131 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hashida, M. Egawa, S. Muranishi, and H. Sezaki. Role of intramuscular administration of water-in-oil emulsions as a method for increasing the delivery of anticancer agents to regional lymphatics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:225–239 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Takahashi, M. Mizuno, Y. Fujita, S. Ueda, B. Nishioka, and S. Majima. Increased concentration of anticancer agents in regional lymph nodes by fat emulsions, with special reference to chemotherapy of metastasis.Gann 64:345–350 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. N. L. Tilney. Patterns of lymphatic drainage in the adult laboratory rat.J. Anat. 109:369–383 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Bollman, J. C. Cain, and J. H. Grindlay. Techniques for the collection of lymph from the liver, small intestine, or thoracic duct of the rat.J. Lab. Clin. Med. 33:1349–1352 (1948)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. D. T. Mahin and R. T. Loftberg. A simplified method of sample preparation for determination of tritium, carbon-14, or sulfur-35 in blood or tissue by liquid scintillation counting.Anal. Biochem. 16:500–509 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. E. Johnson. A conceptual approach to integrated cancer therapy.Cancer 35:1–4 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. V. A. Cooperative Surgical Adjuvant Study Group. Use of thio-tepa as an adjuvant of carcinoma of the stomach.Cancer 18:291–297 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. H. Cole, R. G. Mrazek, S. G. Economou, G. O. McDonald, D. P. Slaughter, and F. W. Sterhl. Adjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer 18:1529–1535 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. Yoffey and F. C. Courtice.Lymphatics, Lymph, and the Lymphomyeloid Complex, Academic Press, London, 1971, Chap. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. S. Sheppard and E. E. Sterns. The difference in the clearance of intestinal albumin by the lymphatics from the stomach and the small and large intestine.Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 140:405–408 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. J. J. P. de Lima, P. Alantara, and D. S. Garcia. An indirect method for the estimation of lymph Mow.Lymphology' 6:169–174 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Bach and G. P. Lewis. Lymph flow and lymph protein concentration in the skin and muscle of the rabbit hind limb.J. Physiol. 235:477–492 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Nishimura, H. Kobayashi, K. Okumura, S. Muranishi, and H. Sezaki. Intramuscular absorption of drugs from the oily solutions in the rat.Chem. Pharm. Bull. 22:1275–1284 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. E. Ballard. Biopharmaceutical considerations in subcutaneous and intramuscular drug administration.J. Pharm. Sci. 57:357–378 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashida, M., Takahashi, Y., Muranishi, S. et al. An application of water-in-oil and gelatin-microsphere-in-oil emulsions to specific delivery of anticancer agent into stomach lymphatics. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 5, 241–255 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065398

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065398

Key words

Navigation