Abstract
We examine the incentives for abuse under rate-of-return (ROR) and incremental surplus subsidy (ISS) regulation. Abuse consists of expenditures by the regulated firm that provide private benefits, but do not reduce production costs. We show that ISS regulation provides efficient incentives for owners of the regulated firm to limit abuse by subordinates. We also prove that abuse by owners of the firm will generally be greater (smaller) under ROR regulation than under ISS regulation when consumer demand for the regulated product is inelastic (elastic). Furthermore, we show that to limit abuse and improve welfare under ROR regulation, it can be advantageous to “ignore” available information about consumer demand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackmon, B. Glenn. 1992. “The Incremental Surplus Subsidy and Rate of Return Regulation.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 4:187–196.
Sappington, David. 1980. “Strategic Firm Behavior Under a Dynamic Regulatory Adjustment Process.”Bell Journal of Economics 11:360–372.
Sappington, David, and David Sibley. 1988. “Regulating Without Cost Information: The Incremental Surplus Subsidy Scheme.”International Economic Review 29:297–306.
Vogelsang, Ingo, and Jorg Finsinger. 1979. “A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms.”Bell Journal of Economics 10:157–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sappington, D.E.M., Sibley, D.S. Regulatory incentive policies and abuse. J Regul Econ 5, 131–141 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065362
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065362