Abstract
Kunreuther, Meszaros, and Hogarth (1993) argue that insurers are risk averse and ambiguity averse, and that they use cognitive reference points and constraints in making pricing decisions. They further claim that insurer ambiguity may be a factor that has a role in market failure at the industry level. Arguably, ambiguity may be an important aspect of decision behavior. In this article, research on managerial risk taking is reviewed with a focus on the relationship between ambiguity and risk taking. In particular, the effects of the organizational and institutional context are highlighted. It is argued that the political aspects of insurer decision behavior should be considered as well. Implications for further study and understanding of decision making are discussed.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. (1965).Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo, Jahnssonis Saatio.
Barrett, P. (1991). “Punitive Awards Still Flummox Lower Courts,”Wall Street Journal, December 5, p. B4.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). “Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669.
Hogarth, R. and H. Kunreuther. (1989). “Risk, Ambiguity and Insurance,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 5–35.
Kahneman, D. (1992). “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms and Mixed Feelings,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51, 296–312.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Choice Under Risk,”Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Kunreuther, H., R. Hogarth, and J. Meszaros. (1993). “Insurer ambiguity and market failure,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 71–87.
Lanir, Z. and Z. Shapira. (1984). “Analysis of Decisions Concerning the Defense of Rear Areas in Israel.” In Z. Lanir (ed.),Israel's Security in the 1980s. New York: Praeger.
Mahfouz, N. (1988), “Clarity is good but so is ambiguity,”The New York Times, October 14.
March, J. and Z. Shapira. (1987). “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking,”Management Science 33, 1404–1418.
March, J. and Z. Shapira. (1992). “Variable Risk Preferences and the Focus of Attention,”Psychological Review 99, 172–183.
Roy, A. (1952). “Safety First and the Holding of Assets,”Econometrica 20, 431–449.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1991) “Reference Theory of Choice and Exchange,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 1039–1061.
Shapira, Z. (1975). “Measuring Subjective Probabilities by the Magnitude Production Method,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 14, 314–321.
Shapira, Z. (1994).Managerial Risk Taking. New York: Russell Sage. Forthcoming.
Shapira, Z. (1993). “Risk Sharing and Incentive Contracts: On Setting Compensation Policy for Expatriate Professionals in a Foreign Operation.” In Y. Aharoni (ed.),Coalition and Competition: Globalization of Professional Services. London: Routledge.
Shapira, Z. (1992). “Incentives, Attention and Risk Taking: Analyzing the Behavior of Government Bonds Traders,” working paper, New York University, New York, NY.
Shapira, Z. and I. Venezia. (1992). “Size and Frequency of Prizes as Determinants of the Demand for Lotteries,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 52, 307–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shapira, Z. Ambiguity and risk taking in organizations. J Risk Uncertainty 7, 89–94 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065316
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065316