Abstract
A series of studies examines whether certain biases in probability assessments and perceptions of loss, previously found in experimental studies, affect consumers' decisions about insurance. Framing manipulations lead the consumers studied here to make hypothetical insurance-purchase choices that violate basic laws of probability and value. Subjects exhibit distortions in their perception of risk and framing effects in evaluating premiums and benefits. Illustrations from insurance markets suggest that the same effects occur when consumers make actual insurance purchases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care,”American Economic Review 53, 941–969.
Camerer, C. and H. Kunreuther. (1989). “Experimental Markets for Insurance,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 265–300.
Combs, B. and P. Slovic. (1979). “Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death,”Journalism Quarterly 56, 837–843.
Committee for Economic Development. (1989).Who Shall be Liable? New York: Committee for Economic Development.
Cummins, D. and S. Weisbart. (1978).The Impact of Consumer Services on Independent Insurance Agency Performance. Glenmont, NY: IMA Education and Research Foundation.
Dionne, G. and S. Harrington. (1992). “An Introduction to Insurance Economics.” In G. Dionne and S. Harrington (eds.),Foundations of Insurance Economics. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Eisner, Robert, and Robert H. Strotz. (1961). Flight Insurance and the Theory of Choice,”Journal of Political Economy 69, 355–368.
Hershey, J. and P. Schoemaker. (1980). “Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses.”Journal of Risk and Insurance 47, 111–132.
Hershey, J., H. Kunreuther, and P. Schoemaker. (1982). “Sources of Bias in Assessment Procedures for Utility Functions,”Management Science 28, 936–954.
Insurance Information Institute. (1990a).1990 Property/Casualty Insurance Facts. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
Insurance Information Institute. (1990b).No-Fault Auto Insurance. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
Insurance Information Institute (1992).No-Fault Auto Insurance. New York: Insurance Information Institute.
Kahneman, D. (1986). “Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method.” In R. G. Cummings, D. S. Brookshire, and W. D. Schulze (eds.),Valuing Environmental Good: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Kahneman, Daniel and Jack L. Knetsch. (1992). “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57–70.
Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. (1990). “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,”Journal of Political Economy 98, 1325–1348.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1984). “Choices, Values, and Frames,”American Psychologist 39, 341–350.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Kunreuther, H., R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, P. Slovic, B. Borkin, and N. Katz. (1978).Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: Wiley.
Kunreuther, H., R. Hogarth, and J. Meszaros. (this issue). “Insurer Ambiguity and Market Failure,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
Lichtenstein, S., P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, M. Layman, and B. Combs. (1978). “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4, 551–578.
Pashigian, B., L. Schkade, and G. Menefee. (1966). “The Selection of an Optimal Deductible for a Given Insurance Policy.”Journal of Business 39, 35–44.
Ritov, I. and J. Baron. (1992). “Status-Quo and Omission Biases,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 49–61.
Samuelson, W. and R. Zeckhauser. (1988). “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1, 7–59.
State Farm. (1990).1990 State Farm Year. Bloomington, IL: State Farm.
Thaler, R. (1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,”Marketing Science 4, 199–214.
Thaler, Richard and Eric J. Johnson. (1990). “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,”Management Science 36, 643–660.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”Science 211, 453–458.
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. (1983). “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,”Psychological Review 90, 293–315.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1991). “Loss Aversion and Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
United Press International. (1990). “The New Madrid Fault and the Prophecy of Iben Browning,” September 13. 1990.
Winter, R. (1991). “The Liability Insurance Market,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 115–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, E.J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J. et al. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J Risk Uncertainty 7, 35–51 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065313
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065313