Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 5–15

Making decisions about liability and insurance: Editors' comments

  • Colin Camerer
  • Howard Kunreuther
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acton, Jan and Lloyd Dixon. (1992).Superfund and Transaction Costs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, Jonathan. (in press). “Nonconsequentialist Decisions,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, Jonathan, Rajeev Gowda, and Howard Kunreuther. (1993). “Attitudes Toward Managing Hazardous Waste: What Should Be Cleaned Up and Who Should Pay For It?”Risk Analysis 13, 183–192.Google Scholar
  4. Camerer, Colin F. and Martin Weber. (1992). “Recent Developments in Modelling Preference: Ambiguity and Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 325–370.Google Scholar
  5. Committee for Economic Development. (1989).Who Should Be Liable? New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
  6. Doherty, Neil, Paul Kleindorfer, and Howard Kunreuther. (1990). “An Insurance Perspective on an Integrated Waste Management Strategy.” In Howard Kunreuther and Rajeev Gowda (eds.),Integrating Insurance and Risk Management for Hazardous Wastes. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Doherty, Neil and Lisa Posey. (1992) “Availability Crises in Insurance Markets,” working paper, University of Pennsylvania Risk and Decision Processes Center, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  8. Huber, Peter W. (1988).Liability: The Legal Revolution and Its Consequences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. (1982).Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Landes, William and Richard Posner. (1987).The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mayers, David and Clifford Smith. (1989). “On the Corporate Demand for Insurance: Evidence from the Reinsurance Market,”Journal of Business. 63, 19–40.Google Scholar
  12. Priest, George. (1987). “The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law,”Yale Law Journal 96, 1521–1590.Google Scholar
  13. Samuelson, William and Richard Zeckhauser. (1988). “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 7–60.Google Scholar
  14. Savage, Ian. (1993). “An Empirical Investigation Into the Effect of Psychological Perceptions on the Willingness-to-pay to Reduce Risk,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 75–90.Google Scholar
  15. Shavell, Steven. (1987).The Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Slovic, Paul. (1987). “Perception of Risk,”Science 236, 280–285.Google Scholar
  17. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. (1983). “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,”Psychological Review 90, 293–315.Google Scholar
  18. Viscusi, Kip. (1991).Reforming Products Liability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Camerer
    • 1
  • Howard Kunreuther
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Chicago Graduate School of BusinessChicago
  2. 2.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations