Abstract
Is commission of crime deterred by fear of arrest? Individual self-reported data on the commission of three crimes are analyzed in relation to perceived probabilities of arrest for more than 3000 French-speaking teenagers of the Montreal school population in 1974. The crimes are shoplifting, drug use, and stealing an item worth more than $50.00. In addition to the effect of the individuals' perceptions of the probability of arrest for the three crimes, age, sex, and previous arrest record are also taken into account. The data are all categorical. A multivariate log-linear probability model is estimated in order to test hypotheses concerning the direction and magnitude of bivariate associations among the variables. We conclude that there is clear evidence of a negative association between the subjective probability of arrest for each crime and the frequency of commission of that crime. We also find some negative cross-effects of the perceptions of the probability of arrest for one type of crime on the commission of another, holding constant the direct effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biron, L., Caplan, A., and Leblanc, M. (1975).La construction de l'échantillon, la cueillette des données et leur préparation, CRIJ, Université de Montréal, Montréal.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W., with the collaboration of Light, R. J., and Mosteller, F. (1976).Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (1978).Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Brier, S. S., and Fienberg, S. E. (1980). Recent econometric modelling of crime and punishment: Support for the deterrence hypothesis?Eval. Rev. 4: 147–191.
Erickson, P. G., Gibbs, J. P., and Jensen, G. F. (1977). The deterrence doctrine and perceived certainty of legal punishment.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 305–317.
Gibbs, J. P. (1975).Crime, Punishment and Deterrence, Elsevier, New York.
Goodman, L. A. (1970). The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65: 226–256.
Goodman, L. A. (1971). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications.Technometrics 13: 33–61.
Goodman, L. A. (1972). A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables.Am. Sociol. Rev. 37: 28–46.
Goodman, L. A. (1973). Causal analysis of data from panel studies and other kinds of survey.Am. J. Sociol. 28: 1135–1191.
Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. (1979).Measures of Association for Cross-Classifications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Greenberg, D. F., Kessler, R. C., and Logan, C. H. (1981). Aggregation bias in deterrence research: An empirical analysis.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 18: 128–138.
Haberman, S. J. (1974a).The Analysis of Frequency Data, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Haberman, S. J. (1974b). Log-linear models for frequency tables with ordered classifications.Biometrics 30: 589–600.
Hardt, R. H., and Peterson Hardt, S. P. (1977). On determinating the quality of the delinquency self report method.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 14: 247–261.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring delinquency, Sages, London.
Jensen, G. F., Erickson, M. L., and Gibbs, J. P. (1978). Perceived risk of punishment and self-reported delinquency.Soc. Forces 57: 57–78.
Kawasaki, S. (1979).Application of Log-Linear Probability Models in Econometrics, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Koenig, H., Nerlove, M., and Oudiz, G. (1982). Die Analyse Microökomisches von Konjunkturtest-Daten mit Log-Linearen Wahrscheinlichkeits-Modellen: Ein Einfuhrung.Ifo-Studien 28: 155–191.
Layson, S. (1983). Homicide and deterrence: Another view of the Canadian time series evidence.Can. J. Econ. 16: 52–73.
Link, J. P. (1980). The equivalence between the estimation of joint and conditional log-linear probability models, Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Manski, C. F. (1978). Prospects for inference on deterrence through empirical analysis of individual criminal behavior. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (eds.),Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., pp. 400–424.
Mantel, N. (1966). Models for complex contingency tables and polychotomous responses curves.Biometrics 22: 83–110.
Minor, W. W., and Harry, J. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects in perceptual deterrence research: A replication and extension.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 19: 190–203.
Myers, S. L., Jr. (1983). Estimating the economic model of crime: Employment versus punishment effects.Q. J. Econom. 98: 57–166.
Nagin, D. (1978). General deterrence: A review of the empirical evidence. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (eds.),Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., pp. 94–140.
Nerlove, M. (1983). Expectations, plans, and realizations in theory and practices,Econometrica 51: 1251–1279.
Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J. (1976). Multivariate log-linear probability models for the analysis of qualitative data, Discussion Paper No. 1, Center for Statistics and Probability, North-western University, Evanston, Ill.
Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J. (1978). Book review of Bishop, Feinberg and Holland,Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976,Bull. Am. Math. 84: 470–480.
Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J. (1980). Multivariate log-linear probability models in econometrics, Discussion Paper No. 47, Center for Statistics and Probability, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Palmer, J. (1977). Economic analyses of the deterrent effect of punishment: A review.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 14: 4–21.
Saltzman, L., Paternoster, R., Waldo, G. P., and Chiricos, T. G. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 19: 172–189.
Saltzman-Anderson, L. (1977).A Longitudinal Study of the Deterrence Model, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Criminology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Silberman, M. (1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence.Am. Sociol. Rev. 41: 442–461.
Taylor, J. B. (1978). Econometric models of criminal behavior: A review. In Heineke, G. M. (ed.),Economic Models of Criminal Behavior, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Teevan, J. J., Jr. (1975). Perceptions of punishment: Current research. In Henshel, R. L., and Silverman, R. A. (eds.),Perception in Criminology, Columbia University Press, New York.
Teevan, J. J., Jr. (1976a). Subjective perception of deterrence (continued).J. Res. Crime Delinq. 13: 15–64.
Teevan, J. J., Jr. (1976b). Deterrent effects of punishment: Subjective measures continued.Can. J. Criminol. Correct. 18: 152–160.
Tullock, G. (1974). Does punishment deter crime?Publ. Interest 30: 103–111.
Vuong, Q. H. (1979a). A note on conditional log-linear probability models, Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Vuong, Q. H. (1979b). A further note on conditional log-linear probability models, Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Vuong, Q. H. (1980). Some results on the SCORE parametrization, Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Witte, A. D. (1980). Estimating the economic model of crime with individual data.Q. J. Econom. 94: 57–84.
Witte, A. D. (1983). Estimating the economic model of crime: Reply.Q. J. Econom. 98: 167–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montmarquette, C., Nerlove, M. & Forest, P. Deterrence and delinquency: An analysis of individual data. J Quant Criminol 1, 37–58 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065248
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065248