Skip to main content
Log in

Selective incapacitation and the Philadelphia cohort data

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The University of Pennsylvania study of delinquency in a Philadelphia birth cohort has been described byNewsweek as “perhaps the most influential piece of criminal justice research in the last decade” (March 23, 1981). Many have construed the findings as showing that, if imprisonment were focused on the minority of offenders with especially bad “prognoses,” the rate of crime could be reduced substantially. But others have taken the opposite view that the cohort data, far from endorsing such a “selective incapacitation” strategy, might actually provide strong evidence that such an approach is futile. Through some further analyses of the Philadelphia data, we attempt to clarify their policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avi-Itzhak, B., and Shinnar, R. (1973). Quantitative models in crime control.J. Crim. Just. 1: 185–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A. (1981). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A test of some recent studies.Oper. Res. 29: 346–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A. (1982). An underestimated threat to multiple regression analyses used in job discrimination cases.Indust. Relat. Law J. 5: 156–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., and Moitra, S. (1980). The identification of “career criminals” from “chronic offenders” in a cohort.Law Policy Q. 2: 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., and Nagin, D. (1978). On the optimum use of incarceration for crime control.Oper. Res. 26: 381–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J., and Chaiken, M. (1982).Varieties of Criminal Behavior, RAND Report R-2814-NIJ.

  • Chaiken, J., and Rolph, J. (1980). Selective incapacitation strategies based on estimated crime rates.Oper. Res. 28: 1259–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (1974). Getting 'em Out of Circulation: Does incarceration of juvenile offenders reduce crime?J. Crim. Law Criminol. 65: 528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1983). Incapacitation as a strategy for crime control: Possibilities and pitfalls. InCrime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, R. (1981). Delinquency careers as a simple Markov process. In Fox, J. (ed.),Models in Quantitative Criminology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. (1982).Selective Incapacitation, RAND Report R-2815-NIJ.

  • Maltz, M., and Pollock, S. (1980). Artificial inflation of a delinquency rate by a selection artifact.Oper. Res. 28: 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, T., and Wolfgang, M. (1964).The Measurement of Delinquency, Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1983). A selective artifact in delinquency data revisited.Oper. Res. 31: 852–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirsch, A. (1976).Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments, Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., Sellin, T., and Figlio, R. (1972).Delinquency in a Birth Cohort, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, A., Lofaso, A.J. Selective incapacitation and the Philadelphia cohort data. J Quant Criminol 1, 3–36 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065247

Key words

Navigation