Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of a polarizing current on receptor potential of the isolated frog muscle spindle

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of a polarizing current on electrical activity of the isolated frog muscle spindle was studied. A depolarizing current increased the frequency and reduced the amplitude of afferent spike activity, both spontaneous and evoked by mechanical stimulation. A hyperpolarizing current produced the opposite effect. The amplitude of the receptor potential in response to a mechanical stimulus varied as a linear function of the intensity of the polarizing current

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. N. P. Alekseev, Electrophysiological Investigation of the Phases of the Receptor Potential of the Isolated Frog Muscle Spindle, Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Leningrad (1969).

  2. N. P. Alekseev and P. O. Makarov, "The hyperpolarization phase of the receptor potential of the isolated frog muscle spindle," Biofizika,14, 669 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. P. Alekseev and P. O. Makarov, "Effect of metabolic inhibitors and ouabain on the receptor potential of the isolated frog muscle spindle," Biofizika,15, 93 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. P. Alekseev, "Effect of tetraethylammonium ions on electrical activity of the isolated frog muscle spindle," Neirofiziologiya,4, 208 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. B. Il'inskii and G. N. Akoev, "Action of a direct current on single mechanoreceptors," Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,166, 1243 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. L. Hodgkin, The Nervous Impulse [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. I. Khodorov, The Problem of Excitability [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Baylor and M. G. F. Fuortes, "Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle," J. Physiol. (London),207, 77 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. M. Brown, S. Hagiwara, H. Koike, and R. M. Meech, "Membrane properties of a barnacle photoreceptor examined by the voltage clamp technique," J. Physiol. (London),208, 385 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Calma, "Ions and the receptor potential in the muscle spindle of the frog," J. Physiol. (London),177, 31 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. C. Eccles, The Physiology of Synapses, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Edwards, "Changes in the discharge from a muscle spindle produced by electrotonus in the sensory nerve," J. Physiol. (London),127, 636 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Emonet-Denand and J. Houk, "Some effects of polarizing current on discharges from muscle spindle receptors," Amer. J. Physiol.,216, 404 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. G. F. Fuortes and G. F. Poggio, "Transient responses to sudden illumination in cells of the eye ofLimulus," J. Gen. Physiol.,46 435 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Husmark and D. Ottoson, "Ionic effects on spindle adaptation," J. Physiol. (London),218, 257 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Husmark and D. Ottoson, "Impulse activity of the isolated spindle in potassium-free solution," Acta Physiol. Scand.,83, 486 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. F. Huxley and R. Stampfli, "Effect of potassium and sodium on resting and action potentials of single myelinated nerve fibers," J. Physiol. (London),112, 496 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Ito, "Effects of polarizing currents on long lasting discharges in the frog muscle spindle," Jap. J. Physiol.,20, 697 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Katz, "Depolarization of sensory terminals and initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle," J. Physiol. (London).111, 261 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Kikuchi, K. Naito, and I. Tanaka, "Effect of sodium and potassium ions on the electrical activity of single cells in the lateral eye of the horseshoe crab," J. Physiol. (London),161, 319 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  21. O. C. Lippold, J. G. Nicholls, and J. W. T. Redfearn, "Electrical and mechanical factors in the adaptation of a mammalian muscle spindle," J. Physiol. (London),153, 209 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. R. Loewenstein and N. Ishiko, "Effects of polarization on the receptor membrane and on the first Ranvier node in a sense organ," J. Gen. Physiol.,43, 981 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Millecchia and A. Mauro, "The ventral photoreceptor cells ofLimulus. III. A voltage clamp study," J. Gen. Physiol.,54, 331 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Ottoson, "The Effect of sodium deficiency on the response of the isolated muscle spindle," J. Physiol. (London),171, 109 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Ozeki, "Conductance change associated with receptor potential of gustatory cells in rat," J. Gen. Physiol.,58, 688 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. B. Walter, "Single cell responses from the primitive eyes of an annelid," in: Berngard (Editor), The Functional Organization of the Compound Eye, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965), pp. 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. J. Vulff, "Modification of the receptor potential of theLimulus lateral eye by current and light," Physiol. Behav.,6, 513 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

A. A. Ukhtomskii Physiological Institute, Leningrad State University. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 95–101, January–February, 1973.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alekseev, N.P. Effect of a polarizing current on receptor potential of the isolated frog muscle spindle. Neurophysiology 5, 77–82 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065216

Keywords

Navigation