Abstract
The relationship between unemployment and crime is the subject of research and debate. We present evidence that suggests that recidivism among ex-offenders can be reduced by providing unemployment compensation available immediately after their release from prison. A California program made such benefits—transitional aid—available during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Using a 5-year follow-up and a failure-time model, we show how recidivism among an eligible group was consistently lower over those 5 years than for an ineligible group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G. A. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach,J. Polit. Econ. 76: 169–217.
Berk, R. A., and Rauma, D. (1983). Capitalizing on nonrandom assignment to treatments: A regression-discontinuity evaluation of a crime-control program,J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78: 21–27.
Berk, R. A., Lenihan, K. J., and Rossi, P. H. (1980). Crime and poverty: Some experimental evidence from ex-offenders,Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 766–786.
Block, M. K., and Heineke, J. M. (1975). A labor-theoretic analysis of criminal justice,Am. Econ. Rev. 65: 314–325.
Board of Prison Directors, California State Prison (1858).Annual Report, Superintendent of State Printing, Sacramento.
Board of Prison Directors, California State Prison (1905).Biennial Report for 1902–1904, Superintendent of State Printing, Sacramento.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1963).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegal activities: A theoretical and emprical investigation,J. Polit. Econ. 81: 521–565.
Freeman, R. B. (1983). Crime and unemployment. In Wilson, J. Q. (ed.),Crime and Social Policy, ICS Press, San Francisco, pp. 89–106.
Gail, M. H., Wieand, S., and Piantadosi, S. (1984). Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates,Biometrica 71: 431–444.
Glaser, D. (1964).The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Heineke, J. M. (1978). Substitution among crimes and the question of deterrence: An indirect utility function approach to the study of crime. In Heineke, J. M. (ed.),Economic Models of Criminal Behavior, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Hsiao, C. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data,Economet. Rev. 4: 121–174.
Lawless, J. F. (1982).Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, John Wiley, New York.
Lenihan, K. J. (1978).Unlocking the Second Gate: The Role of Financial Assistance in Reducing Recidivism Among Ex-Prisoners, R&D Monograph 45, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Washington, D.C.
Liker, J. K. (1982). Wage and status effects of employment on affective well-being among ex-felons,Am. Social Rev. 47: 264–283.
Maltz, M. D. (1984).Recidivism, Academic Press, Orlando.
Maltz, M. D., and McCleary, R. (1977). The mathematics of behavioral change,Eval. Q. 1: 421–438.
Nock, S. S., and Rossi, P. H. (1978). Ascription versus achievement in the attribution of social status,Am. J. Sociol. 84: 541–564.
Pownall, G. A. (1969). Employment problems of released offenders, Report to the manpower administration, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.
Rauma, D., and Berk, R. A. (1982). Crime and poverty in California: some quasi-experimental evidence,Soc. Sci. Res. 11: 318–352.
Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A., and Lenihan, K. J. (1980).Money, Work, and Crime: Experimental Evidence, Academic Press, New York.
Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A., and Lenihan, K. J. (1982). Saying it wrong with figures: A comment on Zeisel,Am. J. Sociol. 88: 390–393.
Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate,J. Educ. Stat. 2: 1–26.
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for casual effects: The role of randomization,Ann. Stat. 6: 34–58.
Schmidt, P., and Witte, A. D. (1984).An Economic Analysis of Crime and Justice, Academic Press, New York.
Thornberry, T. P., and Christenson, R. L. (1984). Unemployment and criminal involvement: An investigation of reciprocal causal structure,Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 398–411.
Trochim, W. M. K. (1984).Research Design for Program Evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Witte, A. D. (1975).Work Release in North Carolina: An Evaluation of its Post Release Effects, Institute for Research in Social Science, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Witter, A. D. (1976). Earnings and jobs of ex-offenders: A case study,Month. Labor Rev. 99: 31–39.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., and Sellin, T. (1972).Delinquency in a Birth Cohort, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Zeisel, H. (1982). Disagreement over the evaluation of an experiment,Am. J. Sociol. 88: 378–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rauma, D., Berk, R.A. Remuneration and recidivism: The long-term impact of unemployment compensation on ex-offenders. J Quant Criminol 3, 3–27 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065198
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065198