Skip to main content
Log in

Entry, growth and survival of manufacturing firms

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the interactions between entry size, growth rate, and probability of survival of firm. Standard microeconomics states that firm growth stems from relative efficiency differentials and that growth positively affects the likelihood of survival. Therefore, the selection hypothesis is unable to explain how a wide number of small newly born firms can survive at length even without growth and how an even larger set of firms with a higher than average growth rate exits the market in the first few years after the foundation. It is shown that one way out of these apparent paradoxes is to relax the hypothesis of a one-to-one link between initial relative efficiency and survival, and then develop a model based on different entry modes and growth patterns of the newly born firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrighetti, A., 1991a,Meccanismi di selezione e fattori influenti sulla mortalità delle imprese industrali, mimeo, Milano: Formaper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighetti, A., 1991b, ‘Mortalità delle imprese e l'ipotesi di selezione naturale’,Economia e politica industriale 72(3), 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, O. B., 1991, ‘New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’,Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3), 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., 1990, ‘Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity’,Review of Economics and Statistics 72(4), 551–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlesi, A., 1990,Il problema finanziario nell'economia della nuova impresa, Torino: Giappichelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. and M. Porter, 1976, ‘Barriers to Exit’, in Masson R. and D. Qualls (eds.),Essays in Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe Bain, Cambridge (Mass.): Ballinger, pp. 39–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and R. Revelli, 1986, ‘Natalità e mortalità delle imprese italiane: risultati preliminari e nuove prospettive di ricera’,L'Industria 7(2), 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and R. Revelli, 1987, ‘Process of job Creation and job Destruction in the Italian Economy’,Labour 1(3), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and R. Revelli, 1991, ‘Pattern di espansione e di contrazione occupazionale delle imprese italiane’,L'Industria 12(4), 535–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedy, J. and P. S. Johnson, 1983, ‘Firm Formation in Manufacturing Industry’,Applied Economics 15, 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B. C. and R. G. Lipsey, 1980, ‘Exit Barriers are Entry Barriers: the Durability of Capital as a Barrier to Entry’,Bell Journal of Economics 11, 721–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., 1987a, ‘The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’, in Bresnahan T. F. and R. Schmalensee (eds.),The Empirical Renaissance in Industrial Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., 1987b, ‘Tests of Alternative Theorieis of Firm Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 95, 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank M. Z., 1988, ‘An Intertemporal Model of Industrial Exit’,Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 333–344.

  • Hall, B. H., 1987, ‘The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’, in Bresnahan T. and R. Schalensee (eds.), cit.

  • Hymer, S. e Pashigian P., 1962, ‘Firm Size and the Rate of Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 52 556–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., 1982, ‘Selection and the Evolution of the Industry’,Econometrica 50(3), 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. S., 1985, ‘Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom’,Journal of Industrial Economics 34 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., 1978, ‘On the Size Distribution of Business Firms’,Bell Journal of Economics 9, 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation and the Growth of the Firms’,American Economic Review 52, 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, H. M. and J. Duker, 1986, ‘Survival and Failure in Small Business’,Journal of Small Business Management, January, 30–37.

  • Romanelli, E., 1989, ‘Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-up: Effects on Early Survival’,Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. and R. S. Khemani, 1987, ‘Determinants of Entry and Exit Reconsidered’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 5, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. and C. P. Bonini, 1958, ‘The Size Distribution of Firms’,American Economic Review 48, 607–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. and G. Whittington, 1975, ‘The Size and the Growth of the Firms’,Review of Economic Studies 42, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. and A. M. Jones, 1987, ‘New Firm Formation — a Labour Market Approach to Industrial Entry’,Scottish Journal of Political Economy 34(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M., 1991, ‘Natalità e mortalità delle piccole imprese: un modello interpretativo’,L'Industria 12(3), 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arrighetti, A. Entry, growth and survival of manufacturing firms. Small Bus Econ 6, 127–137 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065185

Keywords

Navigation