Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary: the AMA report on the insanity defense in criminal trials

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Insanity Defense in Criminal Trials and Limitation of Psychiatric Testimony: Report of the AMA Board of Trustees.JAMA 251:22, June 8, 1984, pp. 2967–2981.

  2. Douglas, W.O. The Durham rule: a meeting ground for lawyers and psychiatrists.Iowa L. Rev. 41 485, 489, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer, R. The insanity defense in retreat. TheHastings Center Report, 13: 6, 14, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halpern, A.L. Statement on the Report of Conclusions and Recommendations Regarding the Insanity Defense, before Reference Committee G, American Medical Association, Los Angeles, California, Dec. 5, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnahan, W.A. Changing the insanity defense. InThe Insanity Defense in New York—A Report to Governor Hugh L. Carey. New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, Feb. 11, 1978, p. 141. See also, Halpern, A.L. Elimination of the exculpatory insanity rule: a modern societal need.Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6:4, 611–627, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halpern, A.L. Commentary: the AMA report on the insanity defense in criminal trials. Psych Quart 56, 236–238 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065015

Keywords

Navigation