Skip to main content
Log in

A note on capacity reduction and the role of firm size in declining industries

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Declining industries have been explained by game-theoretic approaches with size as the determining factor as to who exits first. Benefits and costs of capacity reduction have been neglected and are discussed here. When a strategically behaving firm initially reduces capacity, it can force small competitors from the market by internalizing the benefits of capacity reduction. The second factor that determines exit refers to transfering capacity to other markets: First to exit are those firms that are good at reducing their exit costs by finding new markets for their assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caves, R. E. and M. E. Porter, 1977, ‘From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 91(2), 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deily, M. E., 1991, ‘Exit Strategies and Plant-Closing Decisions: The Case of Steel’,Rand Journal of Economics 22(2), 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., C. Matutes and D. Neven, 1991, ‘Cost Differences and Survival in Declining Industries’,European Economic Review 35(8), 1507–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and B. Nalebuff, 1985, ‘Exit’,Rand Journal of Economics 16(2), 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and B. Nalebuff, 1990, ‘The Devolution of Declining Industries’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(1), 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R., 1980,Strategies for Declining Business, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., 1989, ‘Divestment in Declining Industries: Shakeout or “Stakeout”?’, Stanford University mimeo.

  • Reynolds, S. S., 1988, ‘Plant Closing and Exit Behaviour in Declining Industries’,Economica 55(4), 493–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungern-Sternberg, T. von, 1990, ‘The Flexibility to Switch between Different Products’,Economica 57(3), 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whinston, M. D., 1988, ‘Exit with Multiplant Firms’,Rand Journal of Economics 19(4), 568–588.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Horst-Manfred Schellhaaß, Gabriele Wendorf, Henning Hummels and Alexandra Schubert for helpful discussion and the editor for comments on an earlier version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jendges, T. A note on capacity reduction and the role of firm size in declining industries. Small Bus Econ 6, 477–480 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064861

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064861

Keywords

Navigation