Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why are establishments so heterogeneous?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the size of establishments — as opposed to the turnover of workers across a given set of jobs — account for a non-negligible component of gross workers flows. Based on a rich database of establishment-level employment records in western Germany, this paper analyses the magnitude and determinants of job turnover and its relation with labour turnover. Consistently with findings from other countries, it is shown that job turnover is mainly the byproduct of the dispersion of establishment-level outcomes within any industry rather than of job reallocation across different sectors. The role played by disturbances to consumer preferences over differentiated products is also assessed in an attempt to shed some light on the determinants of this tremendous heterogeneity of establishment-level employment changes within each industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, C. H., 1971, ‘Corporate Growth and Diversification’,Journal of Law and Economics 14(4), 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., 1990, ‘Homogenization, Specialization and the Sharing of Output Growth between Incumbents and Entrants’, CV Starr Center for Applied Economics Working Papers, number 49.

  • Boeri, T. and U. Cramer, 1992, ‘Employment Growth, Incumbents and Entrants: Evidence from Germany’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 10(1), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda, M. and C. Wyplosz, 1993, ‘Gross Worker and Job Flows in Europe’, mimeo, INSEAD Business School.

  • Cramer, U. and M. Koller, 1988, ‘Gewinne und Verluste von Arbeitsplaetzen in Betrieben — der “Job Turnover” — Ansatz’,Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung 21(3), 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. and J. Haltiwanger, 1990, ‘Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic Implications’,NBER Macroeconomics Annual 5(2), 123–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. and J. Haltiwanger, 1992, ‘Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 72(3), 819–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘Plant Turnover and Gross Employment Flows in the US Manufacturing Sector’,Journal of Labour Economics 7(1), 48–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. and A. Pakes, 1988, ‘Empirical Implications of Alternative Models of Firm Dynamics’, paper presented at the NBER Conference on Dynamic Aspects of Firm and Industry Behaviour, Cambridge.

  • Gollop, F. M. and J. L. Monahan, 1991, ‘A Generalized Index of Diversification: Trends in US Manufacturing’,Review of Economics and Statistics 70(3), 318–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, A., 1993, ‘Job Creation and Job Destruction: An Overview of Recent Literature and Directions for Research’, mimeo, OECD.

  • Hopenhayn, H. A., 1992, ‘Exit, Selection, and the Value of Firms’,Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16(1), 621–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., 1982, ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’,Econometrica 50(4), 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. and S. Lach, 1989, ‘Entry, Exit, and Diffusion with Learning by Doing’,American Economic Review 79(5), 690–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. S., 1988, ‘Firm and Establishment Growth and Stability’, paper presented at the NBER Conference on “Dynamic Aspects of Firm and Industry Behaviour”, Cambridge.

  • OECD, 1987,Employment Outlook, Paris.

  • Streitweiser, M. L., 1991, ‘The Extent and Nature of Establishment-Level Diversification in Sixteen US Manufacturing Industries’,Journal of Law and Economics 61(4), 503–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Violante, G. and A. Prat, 1992, ‘Cyclical Aspects and Firms Heterogeneity in Job Reallocation: Evidence from Italian Data’, mimeo, Turin.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OECD, 2, rue André Pascal, F-75775, Paris Cedex 16

    Tito Boeri

Authors
  1. Tito Boeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD. The author would like to thank Boyan Jovanovic and an anonymous referee for useful comments on an initial draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boeri, T. Why are establishments so heterogeneous?. Small Bus Econ 6, 409–420 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064856

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064856

Keywords

Search

Navigation