What happens when victims resist robbers? Logistic regression analysis of over 4500 sample robbery incidents reported in the 1979–1985 National Crime Surveys reveals the following about various forms of victim resistance. Self-protection (SP) of any kind apparently reduces the probability of the robbery being completed, i.e., the robber getting away with the victim's property. Armed resistance is more effective than unarmed resistance, and resistance with a gun, though relatively rare, is the most effective victim response of all. Resistance with a gun also appears to reduce the likelihood of the victim being injured, while two types of resistance appear to increase it: (1) unarmed physical force against the robber and (2) trying to get help, attract attention, or scare the robber away. The robber's possession of a gun appears to inhibit victim resistance, which can sometimes provoke a robber to attack; robber gun possession thereby reduces the probability of victim injury. However, even controlling for victim resistance, robber gun possession, is associated with a lower rate of injury to the victim. Finally, robbers with handguns are much more likely to complete their robberies, and those with knives and other weapons are somewhat more likely to do so, compared to unarmed robbers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alexander, C. H. (1987).Workshop on the design and use of the National Crime Survey. Session 10: Use of NCS for estimation. Unpublished paper, Statistical Methods Division, Bureau of the Census, Suitland, MD.
Alexander, C. H. (1988). Telephone conversation, July 5.
Anderson, J. (1991). How not to be a target.Parade Mag. April 7: 18, 21, 22.
Block, R. (1977).Violent Crime, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Block, R., and Block, C. (1980). Decisions and data. “The transformation of robbery incidents into official robbery statistics.”J. Crim. Law Criminol. 71: 622–636.
Conklin, J. E. (1972).Robbery and the Criminal Justice System, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Cook, P. J. (1976). A strategic choice analysis of robbery. In Skogan, W. (ed.),Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 173–187.
Cook, P. J. (1979). The effect of gun availability on robbery and robbery murder. In Haveman, R. and Zellner, B. B. (eds.),Policy Studies Review Annual, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 743–781.
Cook, P. J. (1980). Reducing injury and death rates in robbery.Policy Anal. 6: 21–45.
Cook, P. J. (1982). The role of firearms in violent crime. In Wolfgang, M. E., and Weiner, N. A. (eds.),Criminal Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 236–291.
Cook, P. J. (1985). The case of the missing victims: Gunshot woundings in the National Crime Survey.J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 91–102.
Cook, P. J. (1986). The relationship between victim resistance and injury in noncommercial robbery.J. Legal Stud. 15: 405–416.
Cook, P. J. (1987). Robbery violence.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 78: 357–76.
Cook, P. J., and Nagin, D. (1979).Does the Weapon Matter? INSLAW, Washington, DC.
Felson, R. B., and Steadman, H. J. (1983). Situational factors in disputes leading to criminal violence.Criminology 21: 59–74.
Hindelang, M. J. (1976).Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) (1987a).National Crime Surveys: National Sample, 1979–1985 (Revised Questionnaire), Study 8608 (MRDF), Bureau of Justice Statistics (producer), Washington, DC; ICPSR (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) (1987b).National Crime Survey: Victim Risk Supplement, 1983, Study 8316 (MRDF), Bureau of Justice Statistics (producer), Washington, DC; ICPSR (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI.
King, J. W. (1987). Situational factors and the escalation of criminal violence. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Montreal, Canada.
Kleck, G. (1988). Crime control through the private use of armed force.Soc. Problems 35: 1–21.
Kleck, G. (1991).Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Kleck, G., and McElrath, K. (1991). The effects of weaponry on human violence.Soc. Forces 69: 669–692.
Kleck, G., and Patterson, E. B. forthcoming. The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates.Journal of Quantitative Criminology.
Kleck, G. and Sayles, S. (1990).Rape and resistance. Soc. Problems 37: 149–162.
Luckenbill, D. F. (1980). Patterns of force in robbery.Deviant Behav. 1: 361–378.
Luckenbill, D. F. (1982). Compliance under threat of severe punishment.Soc. Forces 60: 811–825.
McDonald, J. (1975).Armed Robbery: Offenders and Their Victims, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL.
McDowall, D. (1986). Gun availability and robbery rates: A panel study of large U.S. cities, 1974–1978.Law Policy 8: 135–148.
National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence (1969).Crimes of Violence, Vol. 11.A Staff Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Normandeau, A. (1968).Trends and Patterns in Crimes of Robbery, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
President's Commission on Crime in the District of Columbia (1966).Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Quinsey, V. L., and Upfold, D. (1985). Rape completion and victim injury as a function of female resistance strategy.Can. J. Behav. Sci. 17: 40–50.
Skogan, W. (1978). Weapon use in robbery. In Inciardi, J. A., and Pottieger, A. E. (eds.),Violent Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 61–73.
Skogan, W. (1981).Issues in the Measurement of Victimization, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Skogan, W. and Block, R. (1983). Resistance and injury in non-fatal assaultive violence.Victimology 8: 215–226.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1987).Robbery Victims, BJS Special Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1990).Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1988, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
U.S. National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service (1978).Criminal Victimization in the United States 1977, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Weiner, N. A. (1987). Situational dynamics and juvenile interpersonal violence. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Montreal.
Weir, A. (1973). The robbery event. InThe Prevention and Control of Robbery, Vol. 1, Center on Administration of Criminal Justice, University of California, Davis.
Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., and Daly, K. (1983).Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime and Violence in America, Aldine, New York.
Ziegenhagen, E. A., and Brosnan, D. (1985). Victim responses to robbery and crime control policy.Criminology 23: 675–695.
Zimring, F. E. (1972). The medium is the message: Firearm caliber as a determinant of death from assault.J. Legal Stud 1: 97–123.
Zimring, F. E., and Hawkins, G. (1987).The Citizen's Guide to Gun Control, Macmillan, New York.
Zimring, F. E., and Zuehl, J. (1986). Victim injury death in urban robbery: A Chicago study.J. Legal Stud. 15: 1–40.
About this article
Cite this article
Kleck, G., DeLone, M.A. Victim resistance and offender weapon effects in robbery. J Quant Criminol 9, 55–81 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064237
- victim resistance
- gun control