Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of tillage and cropping-intensity on cereal response to nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient fertilizer use is a prerequisite for achieving optimum crop yield while avoiding environmental contamination. Cereal response to nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), and phosphorus (P) were determined for 6 years under differing tillage [conventional-till (CT) vs. no-till (NT)] and intensity of cropping (cereal/fallow vs. cereal/cereal). Semidwarf white winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) alternated yearly with either fallow or spring cereal [barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) or spring wheat] on a Typic Haploxeroll soil in a 415 mm rainfall zone. Fertilizer treatments were no fertilizer (None), N only (N), N plus S (NS), and N plus S plus P (NSP). Average application rate, when applied, was 109 kg N, 18 kg S, and 11 kg P ha−1. Average cereal yield without fertilizer was 1.82 t ha−1. Nitrogen increased grain yield in 6 of 6, S in 4 of 6, and P in 3 of 6 years, with P and S response significant the remaining years at the 10% probability level. Average yield increases were 1.11 t ha−1 for N, 0.93 t ha−1 for S, and 0.47 t ha−1 for P. The NT/CT yield ratio was 0.60, 0.75, 0.93, and 0.95 with None, N, NS, and NSP addition, respectively, indicating that N and S deficiency were more severe in no-till. Limited increase in the NT/CT ratio with P addition indicated that P deficiency was less affected by tillage. Winter wheat always yielded less under NT than CT regardless of fertility, whereas spring cereals reached equality when fertilized with NSP. Annually-cropped wheat yielded 52, 67, 89, and 90% of wheat after fallow with None, N, NS, and NSP, respectively. Thus N and S, but not P, deficiency was more intense with increased frequency of cropping. Adequate fertility was a prime prerequisite for efficient yield in all systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison FE (1973) The role of soil organic matter in crop production. New York, Elsevier Sci Publ Co

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horneck DA, Hart JM, Topper K and Koepsell B (1989) Methods of soil analysis used in the soil testing laboratory at Oregon State University. SM89: 4, Corvallis, OR, Oregon Agric Exp Stn

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leggett GE (1959) Relationship between wheat yield, available moisture, and available nitrogen in eastern Washington dryland areas. Washington Agric Exp Stn Bull 609

  4. Luebs RE and Laag AE (1969) Evapotranspiration and water stress of barley with increased nitrogen. Agron J 61: 921–924

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olson RA (1984) Nitrogen use in dryland farming under semiarid conditions. In Hauk RD, ed. Nitrogen in Crop Production, pp. 335–347, Madison, WI, ASA-CSSA-SSSA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips RE, Blevins RL, Thomas GW, Frye WW and Phillips SH (1980) No tillage agriculture. Science 208: 1108–1113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Power JF (1990) Fertility management and nutrient cycling. In: Singh RP, Parr JF and Stewart BA (eds) Dryland Agriculture: Strategies for Sustainability, pp 131–150. Adv Soil Sci, Vol. 13. New York, Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramig RE, Rasmussen PE, Allmaras RR and Smith CM (1975) Nitrogen-sulfur relations in soft white winter wheat. I. Yield response to fertilizer and residual sulfur. Agron J 67: 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  9. Randall GW, Wells KL and Hanway JJ (1985) Modern techniques in fertilizer application. In Engelstad OP (ed.) Fertilizer Technology and Use, pp 521–560, 3rd edn, Madison, WI, Soil Sci Soc Am

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen PE and Kresge PO (1986) Crop response to sulfur in the western United States. In: Tabatabai MA (ed) Sulfur in Agriculture, pp 357–375. Monogr 27. Madison, WI, American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steel RDG and Torrie JG (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd edn. New York, McGra-Hill Book Co

    Google Scholar 

  12. Viets FG Jr (1962) Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Adv Agron 14: 223–264

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vitosh ML, Darlington WH, Rice CW and Christenson DR (1985) Fertilizer management for conservation tillage. In: D'Itri FM (ed) A Systems Approach to Conservation Tillage, pp 89–98. Chelsea, MI, Lewis Publ Inc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmussen, P.E., Douglas, C.L. The influence of tillage and cropping-intensity on cereal response to nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus. Fertilizer Research 31, 15–19 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064223

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064223

Key words

Navigation