Skip to main content
Log in

Making sense of ‘on denoting’

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The widely held assumption about what motivated “On Denoting” is irreconcilable with Russell's position shortly beforehand; but discarding it leaves one with a carefully worked out solution whose problem is missing. The real motivation is to be found in a notoriously obscure passage in OD, in which Russell exposes a decisive (though easily overlooked) flaw in his former theory of denoting; a flaw which also cripples Frege's theory of sense and reference. A comprehensive account of this passage is the chief concern of the present paper. Recognizing the critical role of this argument of Russell's leads to a more credible account of his argumentation in that essay. It also suggests that the fundamental standpoint underlyingThe Principles of Mathematics remains intact. In this light, the appropriation of OD to the philosophy of language may be misguided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1971,Russell and Moore: The Analytic Heritage, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan: 1978, ‘The power of Russell's Criticism of Frege: “On Denoting” pp. 48–50’,Analysis 38, 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Richard: 1987, ‘On the origins of Russell's Theory of Descriptions’, inPhilosophical Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffa, J. A.: 1985, ‘Russell as a Platonic Dialogue: The Matter of Denoting’,Synthese 45, 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: 1973,Frege: Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael: 1981,The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1982,The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1892, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in Geach, P. T. and Black, M. (eds.)Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, (2nd ed., 1960) Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1897, ‘Logic’, in H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds.) (1979),Posthumous Writings, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 126–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, Peter: 1980, ‘Russell's Substitutional Theory’,Synthese 45, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, Peter: 1990,Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytical Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, Douglas (ed.): 1973,Essays in Analysis, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, Leonard: 1969,Referring, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. C. (ed.): 1956,Logic and Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903,The Principles of Mathematics (2nd ed. 1937), Allen & Unwin, London. (‘PoM’ in the text).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903b, ‘On Meaning and Denotation’, in A. Urquhart and A. C. Lewis (eds.): 1994 (‘OMAD’ in the text.)

  • Russell, B.: 1904, ‘Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions’, in Lackey (ed.), 1973, pp. 21–76. Originally inMind, n.s. 13.

  • Russell, B.: 1905a, ‘The Existential Import of Propositions’, in Lackey, (ed.), 1973, pp. 98–102. Originally inMind, n.s.14.

  • Russell, B.: 1905b, ‘On Fundamentals’ in A. Urquhart and A. C. Lewis (eds.) 1994 (‘OF’ in the text.)

  • Russell, B.: 1905c, ‘On Denoting’, in Marsh, (ed.) 1956, pp. 41–56. (Also in Lackey, (ed.) 1973, pp. 103–119.) Originally inMind, n.s. 14. (‘OD’ in the text.)

  • Russell, B.: 1910a, ‘The Nature of Truth and Falsehood’, inPhilosophical Essays (1910), Longmans, London; (1966), Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1910b (with Whitehead, A. N.)Principia Mathematica, Vol. I. (2nd ed. 1925), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1911, ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, inMysticism and Logic. Originally in theProceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1910–11.

  • Sainsbury, R. M.: 1979,Russell, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1958, ‘Russell's Objections to Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference’,Analysis 18, 137–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A. and Lewis, A. C. (eds.): 1994,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 4,Foundations of Logic 1903–05, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makin, G. Making sense of ‘on denoting’. Synthese 102, 383–412 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064122

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064122

Keywords

Navigation