Abstract
The widely held assumption about what motivated “On Denoting” is irreconcilable with Russell's position shortly beforehand; but discarding it leaves one with a carefully worked out solution whose problem is missing. The real motivation is to be found in a notoriously obscure passage in OD, in which Russell exposes a decisive (though easily overlooked) flaw in his former theory of denoting; a flaw which also cripples Frege's theory of sense and reference. A comprehensive account of this passage is the chief concern of the present paper. Recognizing the critical role of this argument of Russell's leads to a more credible account of his argumentation in that essay. It also suggests that the fundamental standpoint underlyingThe Principles of Mathematics remains intact. In this light, the appropriation of OD to the philosophy of language may be misguided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayer, A. J.: 1971,Russell and Moore: The Analytic Heritage, Macmillan, London.
Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan: 1978, ‘The power of Russell's Criticism of Frege: “On Denoting” pp. 48–50’,Analysis 38, 65–77.
Cartwright, Richard: 1987, ‘On the origins of Russell's Theory of Descriptions’, inPhilosophical Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 95–134.
Coffa, J. A.: 1985, ‘Russell as a Platonic Dialogue: The Matter of Denoting’,Synthese 45, 43–70.
Dummett, Michael: 1973,Frege: Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.
Dummett, Michael: 1981,The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Duckworth, London.
Evans, Gareth: 1982,The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Frege, G.: 1892, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in Geach, P. T. and Black, M. (eds.)Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, (2nd ed., 1960) Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 56–78.
Frege, G.: 1897, ‘Logic’, in H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds.) (1979),Posthumous Writings, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 126–51.
Hylton, Peter: 1980, ‘Russell's Substitutional Theory’,Synthese 45, 1–31.
Hylton, Peter: 1990,Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytical Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lackey, Douglas (ed.): 1973,Essays in Analysis, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Linsky, Leonard: 1969,Referring, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Marsh, R. C. (ed.): 1956,Logic and Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London.
Russell, B.: 1903,The Principles of Mathematics (2nd ed. 1937), Allen & Unwin, London. (‘PoM’ in the text).
Russell, B.: 1903b, ‘On Meaning and Denotation’, in A. Urquhart and A. C. Lewis (eds.): 1994 (‘OMAD’ in the text.)
Russell, B.: 1904, ‘Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions’, in Lackey (ed.), 1973, pp. 21–76. Originally inMind, n.s. 13.
Russell, B.: 1905a, ‘The Existential Import of Propositions’, in Lackey, (ed.), 1973, pp. 98–102. Originally inMind, n.s.14.
Russell, B.: 1905b, ‘On Fundamentals’ in A. Urquhart and A. C. Lewis (eds.) 1994 (‘OF’ in the text.)
Russell, B.: 1905c, ‘On Denoting’, in Marsh, (ed.) 1956, pp. 41–56. (Also in Lackey, (ed.) 1973, pp. 103–119.) Originally inMind, n.s. 14. (‘OD’ in the text.)
Russell, B.: 1910a, ‘The Nature of Truth and Falsehood’, inPhilosophical Essays (1910), Longmans, London; (1966), Allen & Unwin, London.
Russell, B.: 1910b (with Whitehead, A. N.)Principia Mathematica, Vol. I. (2nd ed. 1925), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Russell, B.: 1911, ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, inMysticism and Logic. Originally in theProceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1910–11.
Sainsbury, R. M.: 1979,Russell, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Searle, J. R.: 1958, ‘Russell's Objections to Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference’,Analysis 18, 137–43.
Urquhart, A. and Lewis, A. C. (eds.): 1994,The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 4,Foundations of Logic 1903–05, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makin, G. Making sense of ‘on denoting’. Synthese 102, 383–412 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064122
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064122