Skip to main content
Log in

Increased specificity in measuring satisfaction

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors report a patient satisfaction study that addressed some of the methodological limitations of previous studies and attempted to increase the variance in satisfaction assessment by increasing the scope and specificity of inquiry. Same sex patient/therapist match, duration of therapy, individual therapy and treatment with staff social workers rather than psychiatric residents all were positively correlated with increased patient satisfaction. Satisfaction appeared to be a unitary dimension that could be tapped by a global score. Nonetheless, although overall satisfaction was high, one third of patients preferred an alternative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ware JE: Effects of acquiescent response set on patient satisfaction ratings.Medical Care, 16327–336, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sorenson J, Kantor L, Margolis R, Galano J: The extent, nature and utility of evaluating consumer satisfaction in community mental health centers.Am J of Comm Psychol 7329–337, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lebow J: Consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment,Psychological Bulletin, 91244–259, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger M: Toward maximizing the utility of consumer satisfaction as an outcome. In M Lambert, E Christensen and S DeJulio (Eds.).The Assessment of Psychotherapy Outcome. New York, Wiley and Sons, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McPhee C, Zusman J, Joss RH: Measurement of patient satisfaction: A survey of practices in community mental health centers.Comprehensive Psychiat, 16339–404, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balch P, Ireland J, McWilliams S, Lewis S: Client evaluation of community mental health services.Am J of Comm Psychol, 5243–247, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noel G, and Block N: Client evaluation of outpatient mental health services: Three telephone surveys. In C Landsberg, W Neigher, R Hammer, C Windle, J Way (Eds.)Evaluation In Practice. Bethesda, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalman TP: An overview of patient satisfaction with psychiatric treatment.Hosp and Comm Psychia, 3447–54, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larson DL, Attkesson CC, Hargraves W, Nguyen T: Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale.Evaluation and Program Planning, 2197–207, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slater V, Linn MW, Harris R: A Satisfaction with mental health care scale.Comprehensive Psychiat, 2368–74, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berger M, Callister S:A Review of Comments From Consumer Satisfaction Instruments. Ogden, Utah, Weber Mental Health Center, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hargreaves WA, et al.: Treatment acceptance following intake assignment to individual therapy, group therapy or contact group.Archives of Gen Psychia 31343–349, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koltuv M, Ahmed M, Meyer M: A study of outpatient satisfaction with mental health center services.Hosp and Comm Psychia 29179–182, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalman TP, Talon NS, Frances A: A controlled study of satisfaction among psychobiology research patients.Am J of Psychia, 139344–347, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yeaton W, Seachrest L: Critical dimension in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity and effectiveness.J of Consulting and Clinic Psychol, 49156–167, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Auerbach AH and Johnson M: Research on therapist's level of experience. In AS Gurman and AM Razin (Eds.),Effective Psychotherapy: A Handbook of Research. New York, Pergamon, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strupp HH: A reformulation of the dynamics of the therapist's contribution. In AS Gurman and AM Razin (Eds.),Effective Psychotherapy: A Handbook of Research. New York, Pergamon, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wogan M, Norcross JC: Dimensions of psychotherapists' activity: A replication and extension of earlier findings.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 2067–74, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urquhart, B., Bulow, B., Sweeney, J. et al. Increased specificity in measuring satisfaction. Psych Quart 58, 128–134 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064054

Keywords

Navigation