Skip to main content
Log in

Absolute and relative risk aversion: An experimental study

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kenneth Arrow posed the hypotheses that investors reveal decreasing absolute risk aversion (DARA) and increasing relative risk aversion (IRRA). It is very difficult to empirically test these two hypotheses since one needs to analyze an investor's investment decisions at various points in his/her economic life cycle as the investor's wealth varies. An experimental study is conducted to test these two hypotheses when the subject's wealth varies depending on his/her investment performance. The experiment involves an actual money gain or loss which is indexed to the individual's investment performance. It is found that DARA is indeed strongly supported, but IRRA is rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.Essays of the Theory of Risk Bearing. (1971). Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1987). “Game Theory.” In John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman (eds.),The New Palgrave, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys, Eric, Louis Eeckhoudt, and Henri Loubergé. (1989). “Endogenous Risks and the Risk Premium,”Theory and Decision 26, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, C. Peter. (1988). “Expected Utility: An Anniversary and New Era,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P., and Charles R. Plott. (1978). “Committee Decision Under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study,”American Political Science Review 72 (June), 575–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, Robert, Thomas R. Palfrey, and Charles R. Plott. (1982). “Asset Valuation in an Experimental Market,”Econometrica 50 (May), 537–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, I., and M. Blume (1975). “The Demand for Risky Assets,”American Economic Review (December), 900–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, David M., and Charles R. Plott. (1979). “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon,”American Economic Review 69 (September), 623–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin and Melvin W. Reder, eds. (1987).Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. (1982).Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica 47 (March), 263–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Yoram, and Haim Levy. (1992). “Further Tests of the Separation Theorem and the Capital Asset Pricing Model,”American Economic Review 82, 664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Yoram, Haim Levy, and Harry M. Markowitz (1984). “Mean-Variance versus Direrct Utility Maximization,”Journal of Finance 39 (March), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Yoram, Haim Levy, and Amnon Rapoport. (1988). “Experimental Tests of the Mean-Variance Model for Portfolio Selection,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42, 388–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Yoram, Levy Haim, and Rapoport Amnon. (1988). “Experimental Tests of the Separation Theorem and the Capital Asset Pricing Model,”American Economic Review 78, 500–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Haim, and Paul A. Samuelson. (1992). “The Capital Asset Pricing Model with Diverse Holding Period,”Management Science 38, 1529–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, John (1965). “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investment in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,”Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Harry, M. (1959). “Portfolio Selection,”Journal of Finance 7 (June), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Harry M. (1987).Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. W., and P. A. Samuelson. (1984). “Fallacy of the Log-normal Approximation to Optimal Portfolio Decision Making over Many Periods,”Journal of Financial Economics 1, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, Charles, R. (1986). “Rational Choice in Experimental Markets,”Journal of Business 59 (October), 301–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, Charles R. (1987). “Rational Choice in Experimental Markets.” (1987). In Hogarth and Reder.

  • Plott, Charles, R., and Shyam Sunder. (1982). “Efficiency of Experimental Security Markets with Insider Information: An Application of Rational-Expectations Models,”Journal of Political Economy 90 (41), 665–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, Charles R., and Vernon L. Smith. (1978). “An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions,”Review of Economic Studies 45 (February), 133–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.”Econometrica 32, 122–136.

  • Rapoport, Ammon. (1984). “Effect of Wealth on Portfolios Under Various Investment Conditions,”Acta Psychologica 50 (February), 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M. (1976). “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing ofOptions,”Bell Journal, 407–25.

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1990). “Asset Allocation Could be Dangerous to Your Health,”Journal of Portfolio Management 16 (Spring) 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, William F. (1964). “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk,”Journal of Finance 19, 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vernon, L. (1962). “An Experimental Study of Comparative Market Behavior,”Journal of Political Economics 70 (April), 111–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vernon L. (1991). “Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology,”Journal of Political Economy 99, 878–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos. (1989). In William Sharpe and Katrina F. Shefered (eds.),Quantifying the Market Risk Premium Phenomenon for Investment Decision Making. The Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts (CFA), pp. 73–77.

  • Whitmore, Alex. (1970). “Third Degree Stochastic Dominance,”American Economic Review 60, 457–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, Rami, and Amnon Rapoport. (1985). “Relative Gain Maximization in Sequential Three-Person Characteristic Function Games,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29 (September), 333–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, H. Absolute and relative risk aversion: An experimental study. J Risk Uncertainty 8, 289–307 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064046

Key words

Navigation