Skip to main content
Log in

Individualized network planning for chronic psychiatric patients

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

While most individuals naturally develop networks in the course of social and vocational activities, chronic mental patients may require the assistance of a mental health professional to develop viable networks. Such assistance, which is most needed at the time of placement out of the hospital and into the community, may range from facilitating or consulting to more active network organizing.

In order to determine the level of assistance required by individual patients, clinicians must make a thorough assessment of patients' existing network resources as well as an evaluation of their interpersonal strengths, needs and deficits. Such variables as need for interpersonal distance, tolerance of stress and desire for autonomy should be considered. Attention to these variables, which differ from and must be considered in conjunction with the traditional focus on symptomatology, is essential in network planning.

An individualized approach to network development allows program planners to match different types of patients to different types of networks. In this paper we have described three varieties of social networks to accommodate the needs of a diverse patient population. Such a range of network possibilities affords mental health professionals added flexibility in providing treatment and support to chronic mental patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris M, and Bergman H: Networking with young adult chronic patients,Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 8: 28–35, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruevini U:Networking families in Crisis, Human Sciences Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bachrach LL: Planning services for chronically mentally ill patients,Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 47: 163–188, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheets J, Prevost J, and Reihman J: Young adult chronic patients: Three hypothesized subgroups,Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 33: 197–203, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood V, Harris M, and Bergman H: Community Connections: A model for hospital treatment in the deinstitutionalization era,Community Support Services Journal, 6: 9–10, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris M, Bergman H, and Greenwood V: Integrating hospital and community systems for treating revolving-door patients,Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 33: 225–227, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lamb HR, and Peele R: The need for continuing asylum and sanctuary,Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 35: 798–802, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bachrach LL: Asylum and chronically ill psychiatric patients,American Journal of Psychiatry, 141: 975–978, 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bachrach LL, Young adult chronic patients: An analytical review of the literature,Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 33: 189–197, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, M., Bergman, H.C. & Bachrach, L.L. Individualized network planning for chronic psychiatric patients. Psych Quart 58, 51–56 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064039

Keywords

Navigation