Abstract
In this paper, I try to uncover the role played by Wittgenstein's context principle in his criticism of Russell's theory of types. There is evidence in Wittgenstein's writings that a syntactical version of the context principle in connection with the theory of symbolism functions as a good reason for his dispensing with the theory of types.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Blackwell, K.: 1981, ‘The Early Wittgenstein and the Middle Russell’, in Block (1981), pp. 1–31.
Block, I. (ed.): 1981,Perspectives on The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Cocchiarella, N.: 1980, ‘The Development of the Theory of Logical Types and the Notion of a Logical Subject in Russell's Early Philosophy’,Synthese 45, 71–116.
Cocchiarella, N.: 1989, ‘Russell's Theory of Logical Types and the Atomistic Hierarchy of Sentences’, in C. Savage and A. Anderson (eds.),Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XII, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 41–62.
Consuegra, F.: 1989, ‘Russell's Theory of Types, 1901–1910: Its Complex Origin in the Unpublished Manuscripts’,History and Philosophy of Logic 10, 131–64.
Frege, G.: 1953,The Foundations of Arithmetic, 2nd ed., trans. J. L. Austin, Blackwell, Oxford (originally published in 1884).
Hacker, P.: 1986,Insight and Illusion, rev. ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Ishiguro, H.: 1981, ‘Wittgenstein and the Theory of Types’, in Block (1981), pp. 43–59.
McGuinness, B.: 1972, ‘Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein's Notes on Logic’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie 26, 444–60.
McGuinness, B.: 1974, ‘TheGrundgedanke of theTractatus’, in G. Vessey (ed.),Understanding Wittgenstein, Macmillan, London, pp. 49–61.
Quine, W. V.: 1966, ‘Russell's Ontological Development’,The Journal of Philosophy LXIII, 657–67.
Russell, B.: 1984, ‘Logical Data’, in Russell,Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, Vol. 7, The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, ed. by E. Eames, Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 97–102.
Russell, B., and A. Whitehead: 1973,Principia Mathematica, repr., Vol. I, Cambridge University Press, London (repr. of 1910 original).
Wittgenstein, L.: 1961,Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. Pears and B. McGuinness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1974,Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore, ed. G. H. von Wright, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1979,Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed., ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1979a, ‘Notes on Logic’, in Wittgenstein (1979), pp. 93–104 (originally written in 1913).
Wittgenstein, L.: 1979b, ‘Notes Dictated to G. E. Moore in Norway’, in Wittgenstein (1979), pp. 108–19 (originally written in 1914).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Michael Wrigley (UNICAMP) and Gottfried Gabriel (Universität Konstanz) as well as an anonymous journal referee for their valuable comments on a previous version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruffino, M.A. The context principle and Wittgenstein's criticism of Russell's theory of types. Synthese 98, 401–414 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063927
Keywords
- Good Reason
- Context Principle
- Syntactical Version