Skip to main content
Log in

Using data on offender mobility in ecological research

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents some findings on neighborhood structure, police recorded crime, and offender mobility for the city of Utrecht, the Netherlands. The highest crime rates were found in the inner-city neighborhoods. The findings further show that the occurrence of different types of petty crime in residential neighborhoods is associated with different neighborhood characteristics. It was found that offenders reside predominantly in lower-social status neighborhoods. Using data on offender mobility it is shown that violent crime and vandalism are the more locally committed crimes, as compared to residential burglary and other property crime. Finally, it is proposed that data on offender mobility can be used to gain more insight into the link between certain neighborhood characteristics and crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boelhouwer, P. J., and Dieleman, F. M. (1986).Wonen in de Stad; Samenvatting van sociaalgeografisch onderzoek in de Domstad, Amsterdam.

  • Boggs, S. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns.Am. Sociol. Rev. 30: 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, K., and Coleman, C. (1981).Understanding Crime Rates, Gower, Westmead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E., Mawby, R. I., and Walker, M. A. (1987). A localised crime survey in contrasting areas of a city.Br. J. Criminol. 27: 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. M., and Sampson, R. J. (1986). Key issues in the social ecology of crime. In Byrne, M., and Sampson, R. J. (eds.),The Social Ecology of Crime, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. (1984). Opportunity-based crime rates.Br. J. Criminol. 24: 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., Kluegel, J. R., and Land, K. C. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 505–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., and Clarke, R. V. (1986). Introduction. In Cornish, D. B., and Clarke, R. V. (eds.),The Reasoning Criminal, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, R. D., Geerken, M. R., and Gove, W. R. (1982). Crime rate and social integration.Criminology 20: 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W. R., and Goldstein, M. (1984).Multivariate Analysis, Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. S. (1980). Crime area research. In Georges-Abeyie, D. E., and Harries, K. D. (eds.),Crime, A Spatial Perspective, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H., (1989).Principal Components Analysis, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstadt, P. A. (1975). Environmental opportunities and the ecology of crime. In Silverman, R. A., and Teevan, J. J., Jr. (eds.).Crime in Canadian Society, Butterworth, Toronto, pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, R. M., Hakim, S., and Rengert, G. F. (1986).Metropolitan Crime Patterns, Willow Tree Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiselier, J. P. S. (1979).Kriminaliteit in Nijmegen, een kriminografie van de gemeente Nijmegen, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, T., and Gottheil, E. (1984). Offender characteristics and spatial mobility: An empirical study and some policy implications.Can. J. Criminol. 26: 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., and Williams, J. R. (1985).Informal Citizen Action and Crime Prevention at the Neighborhood Level, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesseling, R. B. P. (1986).Kleine Criminaliteit in Utrecht, A Case Study, Staatsuitgeverij, 's-Gravenhage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., and Kruissink, M. (1990).Ontwikkeling van de Jeugdcriminaliteit:periode 1980–1988, Gouda Quint bv, Arnhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. B. (1980). Facility site selection and analysis through environmental criminology.J. Crim. Just. 18: 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R. (1986). Geographical and temporal changes among robberies in Milwaukee. In Figlio, R. M., Hakim, S., and Rengert, G. F. (eds.),Metropolitan Crime Patterns, Willow Tree Press, New York, pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, J. L., Krohn, M. D., and Bonati, L. M. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 26: 378–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver, J. P. (1981). Criminal mobility: a review of empirical studies. In Hakim, S., and Rengert, G. F. (eds.),Crime Spillover, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1973).Architectural Design for Crime Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. D. (1980). Characteristics and typology of the journey to crime. In Georges-Abeyie, D. E., and Harries, K. D. (eds.),Crime, a Spatial Perspective, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppetto, A. (1974).Residential Crime, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1983). Structural density and criminal victimization.Criminology 21: 276–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization.J. Res. Crim. Delinq. 22: 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1986). Neighborhood family structure and the risk of personal victimization. In Byrne, M., and Sampson, R. J. (eds.),The Social Ecology of Crime, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. C., and McKay, H. D. (1969).Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (1975). Measurement problems in official and survey crime rates.J. Crim. Just. 3: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. F. (1980). Criminal oppportunities and crime rates. In Fienberg, S. E., and Reiss, A. J., Jr. (eds.),Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., and Jarjoura, G. R. (1989). Household characteristics, neighborhood composition and victimization risk.Soc. Forces 68: 621–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahura, J. M., and Sloan, J. J., III (1988). Urban stratification of places, routine activities and suburban crime rates.Soc. Forces 67: 1102–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., and Gottfredson, S. (1986). Environmental design, crime, and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. In Reiss, Jr., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 387–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., and Brower, S. (1980). The defensibility of defensible space: A critical review and a synthetic framework for future research. In Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M. (eds.),Understanding Crime, Current Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P. H., and Dolmén, L. (1990). Crime and crime trends in different urban environments.J. Quant. Criminol. 6: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hesseling, R.B.P. Using data on offender mobility in ecological research. J Quant Criminol 8, 95–112 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062761

Key words

Navigation