Abstract
Earlier research on the relation between school features and petty crime suggests that schools can intentionally influence the crime rate of the pupils. These findings were the starting point for a Dutch study at secondary schools of the same type in Dutch towns. The study focused on effects on the delinquency of third-year low-stream pupils (aged 15–17). For the study a control theory was formulated, a conditional control theory, which, in contrast to Hirschi's social control theory, recognizes possible delinquent influences of the pupils' network. In the study a strong statistical relation between integration of pupils in school and petty crime was found. However, I found almost no influence of the studied school features on integration and petty crime. These results led to the question whether “the real important feature” of schools had been neglected in the study. This seems not to be the case. A multilevel analysis shows that it is unlikely that there is major impact of schools on the integration of pupils, on delinquency, or on the relationship between integration and delinquency. This can be the result of special aspects of the Dutch school system and of the neglect of theory in earlier research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitkin, M., and Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies.J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 189: 1–43.
Baerveldt, C. (1987).School en delinquentie. Tussentijds verslag van een vergelijkend scholenonderzoek naar de relatie tussen school en delinquentie, Gouda Quint, Den Haag.
Baerveldt, C. (1990).De school: broedplaats of broeinest? Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de rol van de school bij de bestrijding en verspreiding van kleine criminaliteit van leerlingen, Gouda Quint, Arnhem.
Baerveldt, C. (1991). Argumenten voor een meerniveau benadering van criminologisch onderzoek.Tijdschrift Criminol. 33: 54–64.
Baerveldt, C., and Snijders, T. A. B. (1991).About the influence of segmentation of networks: Theory and testing. Paper for the Second European Conference on Social Network Analysis in Paris, 1991.
Bosker, R. J., and Snijders, T. A. B. (1990). Statistische aspecten van multi-niveau onderzoek.Tijdschrift Onderwijsres. 15: 317–329.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1985).Criminaliteit als sociaal leerproces. Een toetsing van de differentiële associatietheorie in de versie van Karl Dieter Opp, Gouda Quint, Arnhem.
Cairns, R. B.,et al. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behaviour: Peer support or peer rejection?Developmental Psychology 24: 815–823.
Cuttance, P. (1982). Reflections on the Rutter ethos. The professional researchers response to Fifteen Thousand Hours.Urban Educ. 16: 483–492.
Graham, J. (1988).Schools, Disruptive Behaviour and Delinquency: A Review of Research, Home Office Research Study 96, London.
Heath, H., and Clifford, P. (1980). The seventy thousand hours that Rutter left out.Oxford Rev. Educ. 6: 3–19.
Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Kirke, D. (1991). Drug diffusion among teenagers through their peer networks. Paper for the Second European Conference on Social Network Analysis in Paris, 1991.
Kreft, G. G. (1987).Models and Methods for the Measurement of School Effects, Elinkwijk, Utrecht.
Kreft, I., van den Eeden, P., and de Jong, U. (1986). Schoolloopbanen en schoolkenmerken; het tweede generatie onderzoek naar schoolloopbanen. Paper for the 1986 Flemish/Dutch Congress of Sociologists and Anthropologists, Amsterdam.
Leeuw, F. L.,et al. (1987).Sociale bindingen van jongeren, kleine criminaliteit en beleid: een stand-van-zaken-onderzoek in tien sociaal-wetenschappelijke vakgebieden, Lisbon, Leiden.
Longford, N. T. (1988).VARCL: Software for Variance Component Analysis of Data with Hierarchically Nested Random Effects (Maximum Likelihood), Manual, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
Marwijk Kooy-von Baumhauer, E. van (1984).Scholen verschillen. Erasmus University. Rotterdam.
Mensen, T., and Guldemond, H. (1986). Groepseffecten in individuele leerprestaties. Een vergelijking van drie modellen voor multilevel analyse. Paper for the 1986 Flemish/Dutch Congress of Sociologists and Anthropologists, Groningen.
Mutsaers, M.. and Boendermaker, L. (1990).Criminaliteitspreventie in het onderwijs. Eerste deelexperiment: spijbelcontrole, Ministry of Justice, Den Haag.
Oosthoek, H. (1986). Effecten van de leeromgeving; een multinivobenadering. Paper for the 1986 Flemish/Dutch Congress of Sociologists and Anthropologists, Utrecht.
Power, M. J., Benn, R. T., and Morris, J. N. (1972). Neighbourhood, school and juveniles before the courts,Br. J. Criminol. 12: 111–132.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Morltemore, P., and Ouston, J. (1979).Fifteen Thousand Hours. Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children, Open Books, Somerset.
Sprenger, C. J. A., and Stockman, E. N. (1989).GRADAP User's Manual Version 2.0, Iec. pro Gamma, Groningen.
Sutherland, E. H., and Cressey, D. R. (1960).Principles of Criminology, 6th ed., Lippincott, Chicago.
Tacq, J. (1986). Van multiniveau-probleem naar multiniveau-analyse, Manuscript (Rotterdam).
Tesser, P. (1986). Schoolse identiteit en bereikt onderwijsniveau; een exploratieve analyse. Paper for the 1986 Flemish/Dutch Congress of Sociologists and Anthropologists, Nijmegen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baerveldt, C. Schools and the prevention of petty crime: Search for a missing link. J Quant Criminol 8, 79–94 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062760
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062760